树下-共享学分课程,智慧树旗下

快来观摩国家精品在线开放课程吧

Downloads
Revenue

Description

树下APP是为学校教学管理者打造的教学管理社区,包括共享课程的选择和教学过程的管理。同时,树下APP也是教学管理者个人学习成长的社区。在这里,一起关注教育动态、探讨教学改革、学习名师名课。

In-Apps

树下VIP会员(季卡)
399.00 đ
树下VIP会员(年卡)
1.50 đ
树下VIP会员(半年卡)
799.00 đ

Screenshots

树下-共享学分课程 FAQ

  • Is 树下-共享学分课程 free?

    Yes, 树下-共享学分课程 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 树下-共享学分课程 legit?

    ⚠️ The 树下-共享学分课程 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 树下-共享学分课程 cost?

    树下-共享学分课程 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 399.83 đ.

  • What is 树下-共享学分课程 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 树下-共享学分课程 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Vietnam yet.
Ratings History

树下-共享学分课程 Reviews

dgjsjts on

China

人工小南服务态度非常差

审核错误

枫㙄先生 on

China

个人信息填错了了待审核状态不能修改而且待审核已经好几天了

垃圾软件

炫凌云 on

China

软件登录就有教职工的。用它有什么用。还会闪退。垃圾软件。布局不清晰。想找什么都麻烦

闪退

莹雪迷花昔梦蝶 on

China

闪退 iPhone6sp

垃圾软件

茵茵是猪 on

China

花里胡哨。

你的韩wang on

China

等我学完给你补颗星星

周群银 on

China

登都登不进,系统这么差,配得上一星

垃圾app

树下app作个p的app on

China

额外收费 验证码一直错误 注册号码也注册不了 这么多漏洞 作什么app 别搞笑了???

辣鸡的软件,收取个人信息

Lliquor on

China

瞎搞

没办法

月上同曦 on

China

没办法,很无奈

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

树下-共享学分课程 Competitors

Name
畅想谷粒老师
学术志
优慕课v8
学习思政课
湖南师范大学
智能化同步课堂
课程伴侣
青春山东
共青团山东省委移动服务总门户
教师发展在线
师大网校

树下-共享学分课程 Installs

Last 30 days

树下-共享学分课程 Revenue

Last 30 days

树下-共享学分课程 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 树下-共享学分课程 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.