普通话水平测试-甘言普通话全真考场模拟

2023 PSC Mock Exam App

Description

■ 손끝으로 늘리는 우리말 어휘력
우리말의 정확한 뜻을 공부하는 앱입니다.
머릿속에서만 맴돌았던 단어의 구체적인 뜻을 간단하고 재미있는 퀴즈를 풀며 학습해 보세요.
예쁘지만 그 뜻을 쉽게 짐작할 수 없는 순우리말, 뜻밖의 뜻을 가지고 있는 한자어, 비슷하면서도 다른 말 등 다양한 형태의 문제들이 준비되어 있습니다.
모든 단어의 뜻을 정확하게 알고 있을 필요는 없습니다.
그 단어를 압축적으로 풀이하는 핵심어를 아는 게 중요합니다.
최고 어휘의 문제 풀이 방식은 이 핵심어를 기반으로 단어의 뜻을 자연스레 익힐 수 있도록 설계되었습니다.
■주요 기능
-독특하고 재미있는 문제 풀이 방식
-단어의 정확한 뜻 풀이
-다양한 복습 기능
Hide Show More...

In-Apps

超级会员
499.00 Ft

Screenshots

普通话水平测试 FAQ

  • Is 普通话水平测试 free?

    Yes, 普通话水平测试 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 普通话水平测试 legit?

    ‼️️ The 普通话水平测试 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 普通话水平测试 cost?

    普通话水平测试 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 499.00 Ft.

  • What is 普通话水平测试 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 普通话水平测试 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Hungary yet.
Ratings History

普通话水平测试 Reviews

大歌德 on

China

真不错~

vs就是d会觉得绝对不是你上课看得见 on

China

测的超级准,都可以来试试

22388Iii on

China

特别好啊

房整装待发回家看美好 on

China

不错不错还 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

卫柠 on

China

棒棒哒

huyukun1280 on

China

棒棒哒 考试有救了

好哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

幸运西红柿 on

China

好好好好

)我

1。。。………….. on

China

merjz on

China

好非常的不错的软件值得使用推荐

good

普通话必须行 on

China

特别好

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
283
Top Free
463

Keywords

普通话水平测试 Competitors

普通話水平測試 Installs

Last 30 days

普通話水平測試 Revenue

Last 30 days

普通话水平测试 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 普通話水平測試 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.