婚活+

恋活・婚活するマッチング出会いアプリ

Published by: FIELD
Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

In-Apps

婚活
1,699.90 R$
恋活
10.90 R$
出会い
16.90 R$
有料コイン3000円分
104.90 R$
有料コイン5000円分
179.90 R$
有料コイン10000円分
349.90 R$
有料コイン15000円分
529.90 R$
有料コイン20000円分
749.90 R$
有料コイン29800円分
1,049.90 R$

Screenshots

Loading...
Please wait..

婚活+ FAQ

  • Is 婚活+ free?

    Yes, 婚活+ is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 婚活+ legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 婚活+ cost?

    婚活+ has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 521.34 R$.

  • What is 婚活+ revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 婚活+ app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Brazil yet.
Ratings History

婚活+ Reviews

No Reviews in Brazil
App doesn't have any reviews in Brazil yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

婚活+ Competitors

Name
ひま友チャット - 友達探しトークチャットSNS
チャットSNSで友達と即出会い
恋活アプリDatingで婚活
お見合いマッチングアプリ!
アンジュ-大人の恋活・婚活マッチングアプリ
恋活・婚活マッチングアプリ。30代、40代、50代の出会い
マッチングアプリ CoupLink-婚活・出会い-婚活アプリ
まっちんぐあぷり(マチアプ)出会い系ではない完全な婚活アプリ
SILK(シルク) 年上女性マッチングアプリ
大人な年上女性と年下男子の理想の出会いマッチングアプリ
出会いのマジアイ出会いチャット
マジで恋する出会いチャットアプリ
ペアフル-マッチングアプリで出会い
マッチングアプリで出会いを探そう
IBJS - IBJが提供するお見合いシステム
-Karamo-出逢いが見つかる友達探しお見合い人気SNS
近所でもバレない秘密の見せ合いトークで、気軽にフレンド作り
アッチ系 - チャットで即アポ・即会いできる大人の出会い系
チャットアプリでムフフな出会い希望なら【アッチ系】

婚活+ Installs

Last 30 days

婚活+ Revenue

Last 30 days

婚活+ Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 婚活+ performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.