纸上弹兵

纸上江湖 百变技能

Published by: 男佶 金
Downloads
Revenue

Description

《纸上弹兵》是一款具有Roguelike元素的休闲割草游戏,通过灵活的走位和多样的技能搭配来击败成千上万的敌军。

Screenshots

纸上弹兵 FAQ

  • Is 纸上弹兵 free?

    Yes, 纸上弹兵 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 纸上弹兵 legit?

    ⚠️ The 纸上弹兵 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 纸上弹兵 cost?

    纸上弹兵 is free.

  • What is 纸上弹兵 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 纸上弹兵 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Algeria yet.
Ratings History

纸上弹兵 Reviews

不建议人玩

你房租费 on

China

没吃饱。

不能注销,都是广告

货咯安 on

China

广告广告特别多,收集隐私

笑死

fgjj556 on

China

标为单机游戏,没有网玩不了

垃圾

消耗殆尽几点能到呢大家觉得就到家 on

China

注册了之后根本打不开,根本玩不了,我怀疑是不是收集个人信息的

垃圾游戏

好123fg on

China

看广告什么都无所谓 商店放垃圾技能 买了增加随机量反而还打不顺了

藤野苔原 on

China

经常会卡在某个界面,体验感很差

不错

潞潞小美 on

China

24关之后就通关了吗。谁知道

Bug反馈

九龙江酒 on

China

玩的时候,技能已经12级了,也刷出了金色宝物,但是技能无法立即变更,必须要技能再次升级才会生效,搭配紫色或者蓝色的宝物也是,没兑换时装前是没有的,兑换完就出这个了,导致关卡难度提升

死机

Mao、爷 on

China

一直死机

开始不了游戏啥意思

。。。,,。,,。,,。。,。,,。。,,。 on

China

6,点开始开始不了,才刚玩,就不让玩

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
366

纸上弹兵 Competitors

Name
都市冒险高手:策略养成回合制模拟经营福利益智单机游戏
末世机甲卡牌对决,二次元角色扮演地下城格斗
明日特攻队
Roguelike僵尸割草游戏

纸上弹兵 Installs

Last 30 days

纸上弹兵 Revenue

Last 30 days

纸上弹兵 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 纸上弹兵 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Games
Publisher
男佶 金
Languages
English, Chinese
Recent release
1.1.42 (3 months ago )
Released on
Jul 24, 2022 (2 years ago )
Last Updated
1 week ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.