云上协同

数字化协同平台

Description

“云上协同”是一个以任务为管理中心,兼顾其他办公场景的一站式协作平台。
任何一级组织的活动,都离不开组织内部各部门之间、成员之间以及组织外部相关方之间的协作。高效的组织协作应该是多层次多维度,包括文档的共享、知识的分享、信息的传播、个体之间的即时沟通,群体之间的广泛交流,任务的同步协作等。
“云上协同”的目标就是让大家轻松工作、高效工作。

Screenshots

云上协同 FAQ

  • Is 云上协同 free?

    Yes, 云上协同 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 云上协同 legit?

    ⚠️ The 云上协同 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 云上协同 cost?

    云上协同 is free.

  • What is 云上协同 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 云上协同 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Kazakhstan yet.
Ratings History

云上协同 Reviews

垃圾

zizouqi on

China

垃圾

得分最低的APP

铿锵爆头 on

China

如题。浪潮出品,必是精品。

天天崩

Daoba Liu on

China

天天崩

无语了

吾欲日天 on

China

服了,从来没见过这么垃圾的产品,登陆就有问题

登录都登陆不了,不愧是浪潮出品,浪潮出品必成废品

jingjiuvsmizuioruhullo on

China

登录都登陆不了,不愧是浪潮出品,浪潮出品必成废品

差劲!

薛长长 on

China

查到极致!不好用!你们自己人用这个吗。

垃圾,聊天消息滞后

鑫哥传奇2021 on

China

真无语,现在聊天这种最基本的功能还滞后,真不知道产品经理和研发干什么吃的

版本适配

log long on

China

Ios老版本适配不好,差旅审批老进不去

无法登陆

弄好弄 on

China

换个手机为啥就一直登不上了!!

给前东家来个评论

wyuanjie on

China

开发的什么垃圾玩意儿,本来以为HCM的产品经理已经够拉胯的了,没想到还有更牛的卧龙凤雏,做产品就是一味的堆叠是吧?不做临近功能区分合并,一股脑的堆菜单,看着就乱,而且动不动就升补丁,这是做产品呢还是做测试呢?抓紧换人吧

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

云上协同 Competitors

Name
华为亿家
齐鲁银行手机银行
滨海掌上银行
云加
全新数字化工作体验
aTrust
深信服 零信任
浪潮移动ERP
泉通
智慧园区运营管理及协同办公平台
天津公安
万事ONES
evoPortal3
移动OA

云上协同 Installs

Last 30 days

云上协同 Revenue

Last 30 days

云上协同 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 云上协同 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.