Downloads
Revenue

Description

“好芳法课堂”由知名电视节目主持人王芳创建,分享教育方法,帮助家长们在教育中不焦虑,做更好的父母。分享启蒙窍门,让大家爱上知识、探索知识,进一步提升整体素质。

In-Apps

18铜钱
14.90 RM
68铜钱
49.90 RM
88铜钱
59.90 RM
188铜钱
129.90 RM
288铜钱
199.90 RM
388铜钱
299.90 RM
季卡会员
79.90 RM
年卡会员
299.90 RM
月卡会员
29.90 RM
超级会员
499.90 RM

Screenshots

好芳法课堂 FAQ

  • Is 好芳法课堂 free?

    Yes, 好芳法课堂 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 好芳法课堂 legit?

    ‼️️ The 好芳法课堂 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 好芳法课堂 cost?

    好芳法课堂 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 166.40 RM.

  • What is 好芳法课堂 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 好芳法课堂 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Malaysia yet.
Ratings History

好芳法课堂 Reviews

Prerrot on

China

重复购买,不能单独购买

希望校园更好。 on

China

我爱好芳法课程

偶然qq on

China

🥲

很好

给王萌老师的 on

China

讲的知识很好

好好好好好好

!大概我会有所期待😚 on

China

(如标题所说)

为什么这么卡啊

ksjdlsnrouwu on

China

上课的时候不到一分钟就得加载好久 还经常闪退💔

不好

莼啉ポ潹猫ノ on

China

讲的课还可以😌但是积分给的太少了,东西还这么贵,这一点很差

很好啊

燕麦包 on

China

劳逸结合!

课程太好了

hnlhz0920 on

China

课程太好了,王芳老师讲的太生动了了,孩子很喜欢听,每天跟着涨知识👍

帅哥可遇不可求 on

China

我:无

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

好芳法课堂 Competitors

Name
常青藤爸爸
听故事、听儿歌、看动画、读绘本、唱国学、爱识字、爱表达
绘本课堂
混知
牛听听
熏听启蒙 成长必备
豆神学习法
豆神教育旗下中小学语文学习平台
豆神教育
大语文教育体系的开创者
申怡读书
北斗AR地球仪
AR地球探索
让地球仪更有趣
蓝色星球AR地球仪

好芳法课堂 Installs

Last 30 days

好芳法课堂 Revenue

Last 30 days

好芳法课堂 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 好芳法课堂 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.