莱商手机银行

Description

“用户体验更极致,业务流程更简捷”
“服务场景更全面,金融服务更专业”
“客户服务更贴身,功能使用更智能”
【产品特色】
1、财富总览:资产分类一目了然,账户管理安全可靠
2、收支明细:收支分析,月度账单精准推送
3、智能搜索:一搜直达,精准快速
4、语音助手:客户服务更贴身,轻松会话无障碍
5、亲情圈:一键添加亲情祝福,安全守护亲友账户

Screenshots

莱商手机银行 FAQ

  • Is 莱商手机银行 free?

    Yes, 莱商手机银行 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 莱商手机银行 legit?

    ⚠️ The 莱商手机银行 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 莱商手机银行 cost?

    莱商手机银行 is free.

  • What is 莱商手机银行 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 莱商手机银行 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Colombia yet.
Ratings History

莱商手机银行 Reviews

差劲

2毕吧,昵称都不能重复 on

China

人脸识别三十多次了,一直通过不了?

这个垃圾银行不会在用第二次

游戏策划不得好死 on

China

银行卡办理好了,也激活了,居然取不出钱,提示限额,一毛钱都不能用,打客服电话问,各种踢皮球,让去营业网点办理,又不是就你一家银行。

感觉不好

t-g-r on

China

好多业务本来可以远程办理非要去柜台

认证像shi一样

红红火火奋斗的 on

China

别人都是输入手机号码自动收验证短信。你可好,还要手动编辑短信发送,脸部认证也是垃圾识别率,试了3次,比以前安卓客户端差远了。

我喜欢的女孩在里面工作

我叫唤规划 on

China

qiqi

加油!

DaWu_sd on

China

一直用, 越来越好!

都没有评论的,商行营销力度不行啊

呵呵!!…… on

China

……

优化很差

源少— —! on

China

优化的太差了 一星都是多给的

垃圾

回一句都听1 on

China

垃圾app

不更新不能用

美国 v on

China

非常差劲👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
483

莱商手机银行 Installs

Last 30 days

莱商手机银行 Revenue

Last 30 days

莱商手机银行 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 莱商手机银行 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Finance
Languages
Chinese
Recent release
6.4.47 (1 month ago )
Released on
Apr 16, 2014 (10 years ago )
Last Updated
2 weeks ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.