Description

“知到”是智慧树网的子品牌,全球大型的学分课程运营服务平台,有海内外2000+大学会员。我们源自大学课堂,致力于推动优质教育资源社会化共享,我们希望用“知到”,帮助您成为更好的自己。在这里,你可以畅览海量的优质课程,倾听大师的声音,每天一节课,给大脑营养,从这一刻起!

In-Apps

6课程商品
$33.00
30课程商品
$170.00
198课程商品
$990.00
218课程商品
$1,050.00
248课程商品
$1,260.00
348课程商品
$1,790.00
588课程商品
$2,990.00
知到VIP会员
$930.00
智慧树VIP会员(年卡学生价)
$670.00

Screenshots

知到. FAQ

  • Is 知到. free?

    Yes, 知到. is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 知到. legit?

    ⚠️ The 知到. app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 知到. cost?

    知到. has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $1,098.11.

  • What is 知到. revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 知到. app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

1.39 out of 5

33 ratings in Taiwan

5 star
1
4 star
2
3 star
1
2 star
1
1 star
28
Ratings History

知到. Reviews

一个都不想给,学了显示没学

白毛鸽子幽233 on

Taiwan

适配iPad大小的界面

包租婆的小可爱 on

Taiwan

出个iPad版本的吧

出iPad版本

1wwwt t on

Taiwan

出iPad版本

6颗

你洗洗继续吧 on

Taiwan

给6颗星,这是溢出来的那颗

为什么没有配适iPad的版本

求iPad版本123 on

Taiwan

不能出一个iPad版嘛?目前用iPad还得放大,不能完美配适屏幕

ipad不适配

奇迹行者接水泡 on

China

横屏不适配

真垃圾

购卡丝嘛 on

China

出来折磨人还有什么用

其实我一颗星也不想给

一hauidhee on

China

提个问题,哪来这么多敏感词?“谁提出”、“的概念”算什么敏感词?

优化

云入梦来 on

China

你们不能优化一下你们的刷题系统?一题一卡是吧

垃圾软件

垃圾玩意儿,谁开发的 on

China

垃圾

Store Rankings

Ranking History
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
16
Top Free
120
Top Free
388

Keywords

知到. Competitors

知到. Installs

Last 30 days

知到. Revenue

Last 30 days

知到. Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 知到. performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.