App is temporarily unavailable

瑞银信

让支付变的更简单

Published by: RuiPay Technology Co
Downloads
Revenue

Description

瑞银信全新商户APP,是服务于小微商户的专业收款工具,收款资金实时结算,安全可靠。商户可在线申请终端、激活终端,实时查看收款流水及到账信息。支持瑞银信公司发布的多种终端型号,让您有更多的选择。

Screenshots

瑞银信 FAQ

  • Is 瑞银信 free?

    Yes, 瑞银信 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 瑞银信 legit?

    🤔 The 瑞银信 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 瑞银信 cost?

    瑞银信 is free.

  • What is 瑞银信 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 瑞银信 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Germany yet.
Ratings History

瑞银信 Reviews

泄漏个人电话号码

vainhe on

China

最好是找人来查一下,自从使用后每天都有人打电话来问,要不要用他们的产品,垃圾玩意!换号码了!

咨询微信办理

代理咨询微信 on

China

咨询微信17765552222

1台免费起,免费开代理,级别只升不降

微信15802744001 on

China

收信用卡积分,全网最高。微信15802744001

闪退

酸汤苞谷饭 on

China

闪退,直接进不去

乱扣费!

魚小羊 on

China

说0.38%费率实收1%,这种垃圾早点关门!

垃圾,死活登陆不上去

张小君59647826 on

China

真垃圾最要紧关头死活登陆不上去

垃圾刷卡软件

空白子无语子 on

China

单方面不合理提升费率,单方面说自己公告过了提升费率并没有用户也没有达成共识,欺诈用户群体,并且非法不当盈利,一生黑,必须投诉!

诈骗团伙

金鸡纳霜你 on

China

各种理由的骗你刷个开机399的!不会跟你说头笔399不到账的

四川可付公司骗人做代理,不返开机费用,不退押金

水果馅饼 on

China

机器开完了就各种歪理由不返钱,从一开始就是诈骗,不返开机费用,现在机器没给够买机器的钱也不退,分润也不发

399激活金

1-2-3%4% on

China

感觉这个东西很坑啊,说什么四个月刷够20万返还,但是到那时候客服都不干了,找也找不到人,太坑,相信我,千万别用,要想用的话还是去银行申请正规的POS机吧

Keywords

瑞银信 Competitors

Name
拉卡拉收款宝
51信用卡管家极速版-账单管理工具
乐刷收银通
专业移动支付收银工具
立刷商户版
乐刷乐榕付
嘉联支付
会员宝秒到版
融通金宝
小微商户账单管理
电银微客
如意刷

瑞银信 Installs

Last 30 days

瑞银信 Revenue

Last 30 days

瑞银信 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 瑞银信 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.