凯旗出行

Description

公司将云计算,物联网,智能设备,互联网智能技术与电动自行车结合,致力于全国城市区域共享电单车市场运营,以安全绿色的车型,满足用户不同的出行需求,构建全国城区智慧交通出行网络。

Screenshots

凯旗出行 FAQ

  • Is 凯旗出行 free?

    Yes, 凯旗出行 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 凯旗出行 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 凯旗出行 cost?

    凯旗出行 is free.

  • What is 凯旗出行 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 凯旗出行 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

1.38 out of 5

21 ratings in China

5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
19
Ratings History

凯旗出行 Reviews

垃圾公司,垃圾玩意。

确实是够垃圾的 on

China

手机出故障忘记还车了,最后被别人到处骑,扣了一百多,申请还不通过。

垃圾

周崇圣 on

China

必须强制性充值10元,说的新用户骑行免费前20分钟我就抱着试一试的态度,骑了600米,最后不免费也没事啊,2元钱而已,结果必须强制性充值10元???客服也联系不上,垃圾,迟早倒闭,已经跟成都市12345市长热线举报非法融资!!!!凭什么需要我充值10元,我就给2元不行吗,而且涉嫌虚假宣传,新用户并不免费,也已经一并举报了

用了附近要预充值?都什么年代了

9976797 on

China

这用户体验太差了

充值最低10元

陌陌骗子太多 on

China

我去nima的凯旗 老子就骑一会试试 才不到5分钟 支付需要2元 但是必须要充值余额 最低10元充值 剩下的8元你拿去看医生 我曰腻码辣批

充值10元起。

靳一博 on

China

用车两元。也得冲10元 不然不能付款。太垃圾了。哪有这样强制的。以后再也不用。8块钱 送给你们了。发财吧你们

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

凯旗出行 Competitors

凯旗出行 Installs

Last 30 days

凯旗出行 Revenue

Last 30 days

凯旗出行 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 凯旗出行 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Lifestyle
Languages
English
Recent release
2.9.5 (4 years ago )
Released on
May 29, 2020 (4 years ago )
Also available in
China
Last Updated
3 days ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.