聂卫平围棋

跟着棋圣学围棋

Published by: eStarGo Co.Ltd

Description

聂卫平围棋是聂卫平围棋道场集多年一线教学经验与围棋教研精华,最新打造的集教、学、练、测、赛一体化的线上围棋教育平台,为启蒙至段位的围棋用户提供全周期的棋力进阶方案。
【课程学习】课程回放,课后作业,单元测评,一站式学习
【题库】知识分类,专项练习
【排位赛】全新模式,趣味排位
【AI对弈】人机大战,挑战自我
【聂道赛事】标准化赛事,提升棋力水平

In-Apps

极简围棋课
299.99 R
你好围棋思维课
599.99 R
围棋文化小知识
149.99 R
精品小班围棋启蒙课
59.99 R
【1级-3段】聂道围棋大讲堂
599.99 R
【3段-5段】聂道围棋大讲堂
599.99 R
【5级-1级】聂道围棋大讲堂
599.99 R
【15级-5级】聂道围棋大讲堂
599.99 R
【启蒙-15级】聂道围棋大讲堂
599.99 R
【名师大讲堂】聂道围棋大讲堂
599.99 R

Screenshots

聂卫平围棋 FAQ

  • Is 聂卫平围棋 free?

    Yes, 聂卫平围棋 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 聂卫平围棋 legit?

    🤔 The 聂卫平围棋 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 聂卫平围棋 cost?

    聂卫平围棋 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 470.99 R.

  • What is 聂卫平围棋 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 聂卫平围棋 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in South Africa yet.
Ratings History

聂卫平围棋 Reviews

太垃圾了

Bitworm on

China

经常闪退

不如星阵,也不如野狐,垃圾软件,快吐了

神之一手手手 on

China

不如星阵,也不如野狐,垃圾软件,快吐了,bug多,难用,没人用,垃圾

差评

汤彼默 on

China

是对方超时,他怎么还扣我的星

为啥里面没有积分?

孙闫博 on

China

在范例中为啥有积分,为啥有在真实中没有积分

打不开

yimlan on

China

打不开,打不开

好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好

一分都不想给!! on

China

好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好👍!

特别棒

笨笨哦笨笨 on

China

Ok

掉线淘汰问题

杨轶泷 on

China

每次对手结果一掉线就一直让我等着那里,我又舍不得这个心,就不能像一个掉线淘汰的机制吗?排位赛

很喜欢

杨宗翰老六 on

China

建议大家来玩

修bug

ling84299 on

China

好多bug修修吧,搞得都没法下棋了

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

聂卫平围棋 Competitors

聂卫平围棋 Installs

Last 30 days

聂卫平围棋 Revenue

Last 30 days

聂卫平围棋 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 聂卫平围棋 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.