中国法律法规案例文书大全

公务员考试必备

Published by: 宏香 金
Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

中国法律法规案例文书大全 FAQ

  • Is 中国法律法规案例文书大全 free?

    Yes, 中国法律法规案例文书大全 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 中国法律法规案例文书大全 legit?

    🤔 The 中国法律法规案例文书大全 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 中国法律法规案例文书大全 cost?

    中国法律法规案例文书大全 is free.

  • What is 中国法律法规案例文书大全 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 中国法律法规案例文书大全 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Lithuania yet.
Ratings History

中国法律法规案例文书大全 Reviews

都在说广告,我来说几句

Lawyer.J on

China

作为一个app制作者,人家定期更新app都是免费的,靠什么支撑成本支出?每个人都会买会员吗?既然给大家提供了如此方便的方式查询法律法规,你又不掏钱,人家还不能加广告挣点钱平摊成本?天天嚷嚷广告麻烦的你可以买会员吧,才多少钱?又想没广告又不想掏钱,要求太高了吧

希望开发者看一下

林姨娘ne on

China

希望能增加朗读法条的功能,朗读本段/朗读全文/从当前位置开始朗读至结束,那就非常nice了!!求!!!希望能增加引用法条链接跳转功能!!!现在已经有新的法条开发者在尝试这些功能了,作者如果不与时俱进会失去用户!!

更新较慢

这个软件有待改进 on

China

冷门法律法规更新不及时

不好用

西西卓嘎 on

China

广告多的要命,大家千万别下载

方便

W啊呀呀Y on

China

超级好用!

失效法条标明

588677无外乎的后果 on

China

对于已经失效的法律法规等希望能够标注

很好的软件

咖啡伤身 on

China

软件真的做的特别棒!希望可以尽快更新公司法时间效力规定

最好用的法律法规检索app

tablis! on

China

最好用的,且没有之一。

希望开发者看一下

林姨娘ne on

China

希望能增加朗读法条的功能,朗读本段/朗读全文/从当前位置开始朗读至结束,那就非常nice了!!求

没有语音

薛艳雄 on

China

没有语音

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
50

法律法规及司法解释速查 Installs

Last 30 days

法律法规及司法解释速查 Revenue

Last 30 days

中国法律法规案例文书大全 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 法律法规及司法解释速查 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.