赢火虫让律师更轻松

工具、案源、协作,上赢火虫。法律科技,智慧律师。

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

赢火虫让律师更轻松 FAQ

  • Is 赢火虫让律师更轻松 free?

    Yes, 赢火虫让律师更轻松 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 赢火虫让律师更轻松 legit?

    🤔 The 赢火虫让律师更轻松 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 赢火虫让律师更轻松 cost?

    赢火虫让律师更轻松 is free.

  • What is 赢火虫让律师更轻松 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 赢火虫让律师更轻松 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Ecuador yet.
Ratings History

赢火虫让律师更轻松 Reviews

接待太慢

538,55 on

China

一个上诉案件,在app上发布一个多月了才有,有人接单,上诉期过了,还接了干什么

没什么寄坝内容,还经常强制更新,我更你ml隔壁啊更

客服吐了咯了 on

China

Cn🐴

强制更新

白痴大王 on

China

每次更新都打不开界面,除非在app里下载更新,太影响使用体验

软件强制升级

sh.ron on

China

强制升级新版本,不然就使用不了!

是个好平台,但很多政策不灵活

来郭强 on

China

第一提现限制100块且100的倍数,哪有这么好的事儿,最后全部都被平台收取了,第二视频发布审核过于严苛,第三律师没有回答问题积极性,收费不明确

dghdeucrthca on

China

超赞……………….

找律师太方便了

阿娇绝大部分好吃 on

China

本来带着怀疑角度下载了 赢火虫app,没想到在很快的时间内就帮我匹配到了律师,有点像 法律界的滴滴👍

很好用

张小龙睁大眼 on

China

我自己一直在使用,使用起来很方便,律师服务很好٩(•̤̀ᵕ•̤́๑)ᵒᵏᵎᵎᵎᵎ

电话咨询是骗人的

hhhhhaaaaagen on

China

49元买的电话咨询律师,指派的律师不是平台显示的人,并且还骂人、挂电话。根本没有咨询服务,客服承诺退钱,至今联系不上

小额不受理

omelette_985 on

China

小额不受理,会直接关闭。好像目前不支持注销账户。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

赢火虫让律师更轻松 Installs

Last 30 days

赢火虫让律师更轻松 Revenue

Last 30 days

赢火虫让律师更轻松 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 赢火虫让律师更轻松 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.