一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全

Published by: 强 马
Downloads
Revenue

Description

*****建造师考试复习 找资料 给力推荐《建造师考试大全》
-----内容全面,涵盖一、二级考试所有知识点和真题大全;
分类提供了一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题。

Screenshots

一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 FAQ

  • Is 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 free?

    一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 is not free (it costs 3300.00), however it doesn't contain in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 legit?

    ‼️️ The 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 cost?

    The price of 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 is 3300.00.

  • What is 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in South Korea yet.
Ratings History

一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 Reviews

上当了

神枪第一 on

China

上当了,超级不全,别下载,后悔死了

浪费钱

hyf燕芳000 on

China

不值这个价,就几张卷子,归结的知识点超级不全,还12块钱呢,一块都不值

公路工程管理与实务没有内容

相声界还缺我这一类美男子 on

China

为毛没有公路工程的真题??????花这个钱真的不值!!!

很好的参考资料哦

理想中的生活 on

China

不错不错喔

实惠的喔

aMelodyy on

China

一二级都包括了,不错

还可以吧

笨小孩0919 on

China

没太仔细看呢!

知识点不全,真的只值五块

lan__cat on

China

买了套餐跟12的内容一样,骗子!!!!!

骗钱

云朵2013 on

China

骗人的,浪费钱.

不知道怎么这么高分

e9292639 on

China

知识点不全,但是真题很全,不知道为什么这么高分。感觉值五块钱。

很好

Happy2012hhh on

China

不错,很全面

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
334

一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 Installs

Last 30 days

一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 Revenue

Last 30 days

一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 一、二级建造师考试知识点总结、历年真题大全 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.