玫瑰情人-异性交友约会平台

真实靠谱的情人交友

Downloads
Revenue

Description

真实靠谱的同城交友约会平台

In-Apps

升级VIP
$37.99
置顶三月
$67.99
情人豆98+61颗
$20.99
情人豆488+732颗
$104.99

Screenshots

玫瑰情人 FAQ

  • Is 玫瑰情人 free?

    Yes, 玫瑰情人 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 玫瑰情人 legit?

    ⚠️ The 玫瑰情人 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 玫瑰情人 cost?

    玫瑰情人 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 57.99 $.

  • What is 玫瑰情人 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 玫瑰情人 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Canada yet.
Ratings History

玫瑰情人 Reviews

我是终身会员

天臣陈彬彬 on

China

抱着极大的期待,买了终身会员,998含苹果税,熬夜加了三天,然后加了一堆骗子。

为什么这么多人骂这个软件啊

孙悟悟 on

China

这软件真有那么多不堪吗

诈骗软件

说的话等不到你大姐姐 on

China

充钱也不给开会员,诈骗软件一个,千万别下

..

依然 Top on

China

打开就闪退?

管理太差

没意思8855655 on

China

已经沦为职业女支女的温床

阔以,靠谱

穗乃果您是神!我爱您! on

China

相比而言,这里面的会员更靠谱些,我约了几个都还可以的

充值扣费了,APP显示充值失败

jugvji on

China

骗子软件

垃圾软件

自己选的宝贝 on

China

真的特别垃圾,充值卡完就封号,你封号得有理由吧

账号注册好久也不通过审核

15987138890 on

China

垃圾

实名认证不了

私密派滚 on

China

实名认证不

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

玫瑰情人 Competitors

Name
梅花婚恋-同城再婚相亲征婚软件
汇聚百万离异单身,找到优质再婚对象
约伴出行-自由行搭伙拼车去旅游
志趣相投,结伴出游
N/A
尔蒙-和同城附近陌生人交友约会
同城交友APP约-未满18岁禁入!
请吃饭-约会交友,蹭饭神器
N/A
浪呀-同城交友约会聊天软件
高颜值真实可靠附近社交APP
珍双-单身交友婚恋相亲软件
找对象恋爱约会情侣软件
爱情人-约会交友平台
同城交友-附近单身男女相亲约单必备
同城单身视频语音交友平台

玫瑰情人 Installs

Last 30 days

玫瑰情人 Revenue

Last 30 days

玫瑰情人 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 玫瑰情人 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.