学力星球

未来学习

Downloads
Revenue

Description

学力星球,帮助你获得健康、思维、情绪、关系、事业和财富6个维度的全方位成长。

In-Apps

学豆6元套餐
₹99.00
学豆68元套餐
₹999.00
学豆98元套餐
₹1,499.00
学豆198元套餐
₹2,999.00
学豆298元套餐
₹4,999.00
学豆648元套餐
₹9,900.00
学力星球年度会员
₹4,999.00
学力星球2年年度会员
₹5,900.00

Screenshots

学力星球 FAQ

  • Is 学力星球 free?

    Yes, 学力星球 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 学力星球 legit?

    ⚠️ The 学力星球 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 学力星球 cost?

    学力星球 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ₹3,924.25.

  • What is 学力星球 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 学力星球 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in India yet.
Ratings History

学力星球 Reviews

公司跑路了 不更新了 技术删库跑路

大神木一 on

China

凉了

骗子公司

小亂~ on

China

已经跑路了

打不开APP

fzlgame on

China

怎么现在打不开APP

打不开了

Dejejy on

China

跑路了??

深入推广全民阅读的良心平台

小新给力 on

China

学力星球正在建一座全球华人的『视频图书馆』,十个小视频就能读完一本书,既符合大家使用手机刷视频的节奏,又能培养自己的阅读习惯,利用碎片化时间给自己赋能。

传销性质

上当者本人 on

China

传销软件

垃圾

ddsfcchkbds on

China

怎么会有这样的垃圾软件,公司安排天天刷广告天天刷真服气了苹果平台赶紧下架吧

垃圾

考虑考虑我是不 on

China

垃圾传销害人不浅

骗局

zhuhaidudu on

China

会员费198元,靠拉人头和拼命点广告,每月分几块钱,就是个坑

广告卡顿

举报黑色金属凯迪拉克看 on

China

太卡

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

学力星球 Competitors

Name
分之道
蚁聊
蚁丛聊天
赛普-记录工具
来展业
米粒
海量招聘求职信息
國際文交所
闪电世界
和小猫在一起,离喵心近一点
可推客
可推客-您的记账好帮手
语音导出
国奥体育

学力星球 Installs

Last 30 days

学力星球 Revenue

Last 30 days

学力星球 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 学力星球 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.