誰是臥底 - 香港陀地王

可以選擇指定題目類別

Published by: Best Partner Tech

Description

猜出誰是臥,可選擇不同主題增加趣味。

In-Apps

18 Plus
EGP 29.99
周星馳
EGP 29.99
明星名
EGP 29.99

Screenshots

誰是臥底 FAQ

  • Is 誰是臥底 free?

    Yes, 誰是臥底 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 誰是臥底 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 誰是臥底 cost?

    誰是臥底 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is EGP 29.99.

  • What is 誰是臥底 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 誰是臥底 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Egypt yet.
Ratings History

誰是臥底 Reviews

All my paid content was gone.

Musotiv on

Hong Kong SAR China

I purchased all the paid content in the app a few years ago. Recently, an update logged me out of my account. When I logged back in, all my paid content was gone, and there’s no way to restore it or request a refund. Extremely frustrating and disappointing.

課金登出完又一課過?

人在溫哥華 on

Hong Kong SAR China

頭先同朋友玩買曬三個$8 dlc 唔小心click咗登出 再登入翻又要我比錢? 係咪玩嘢?

內容文字太細

Gogogo giving on

Hong Kong SAR China

App非常有趣和貼地 差不多全部題目我都有課金 但是每個人的文字太細 希望可以整大只D字 因為我用iPad玩 更加明顯 望改進

題目夠地道

MuiChun on

Hong Kong SAR China

遊戲顯示都幾清晰, 希望多d創新元素.

亂撚哂

claytonctk on

Hong Kong SAR China

明明7個玩家入面2個卧底 最後變左3個卧底 幾局都係咁 仲要課左8蚊買個周星馳

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
277

Keywords

誰是臥底 Installs

Last 30 days

誰是臥底 Revenue

Last 30 days

誰是臥底 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 誰是臥底 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.