电脑手机云同步团队协作便签

Loading...
Please wait..

In-Apps

语音通知(团签)980条
118.00 H$
语音通知(团签)400条
48.00 H$
语音通知(团签)60条
8.00 H$
短信通知(团签)400条
48.00 H$
短信通知(团签)60条
8.00 H$
短信通知(团签)980条
118.00 H$
存储空间(团签)1000M
48.00 H$
存储空间(团签)100M
8.00 H$
团签人员上线-扩容10人
588.00 H$
团签人员上线-扩容5人
388.00 H$

Screenshots

FAQ

  • Is 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 free?

    Yes, 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 cost?

    赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 138.00 H$.

  • What is 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Hong Kong SAR China yet.
Ratings History

Reviews

推荐

赛效用户11111 on

China

非常适合团队协作,可以同步共享便签,唯一不足是文字编辑功能稍单一了一点,总体非常满意了

建议

用户迷肉粉效 on

China

怎么删除成员?能否增加自己选择可以做的任务,完成后再点完成,而不是单纯指派。 指派的成员设置有点繁琐,能否设置记忆?

挺好用

cloudaction on

China

推荐

电脑端大不如从前

276013233 on

China

改版后很垃圾。还不如从前的。以前的敬业签电脑端很好,独立界面跟qq一样很方便。,现在网页界面谁没事老打开个网页。不知道咋想的。

寻找好久的心仪便签

叫我大春儿 on

China

里边内容非常合适,唯一不足真的太贵了,一个人100元,我觉得太贵了,相当贵

不怎么好用

发个评论真的好难QaQ on

China

领导非要用强迫的

寻找好久的多人协作团队共享便签独立应用

老用户心里话~ on

China

我们是一个小团队,每天都有待办共享的事情,每次发到微信群、QQ群只要大家讨论就会被淹没。总想找一款适合中小团队使用的共享便签,一直没有找到。直到昨天同行交流群里说赛效团队便签,才下载了看看,出乎意料的好用!!!!团队试用一天后才评论。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Competitors

赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 Installs

Last 30 days

赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 Revenue

Last 30 days

Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 赛效-多人协作团队共享工具 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.