西方哲学-经典合集

西方經典傳世之作 發人深省改變世界

Published by: 芬霞 方
Downloads
Revenue

Description

西方哲学经典遴选出千年来西方的经典传世之作,每一本书都极大的改变西方甚至人类社会。

人性论
君王论
国富论
小逻辑
形而上学
忏悔录-卢梭
战争论
政治学
理想国
社会契约论
第五项修炼
精神现象学-黑格尔
纯粹理性批判
羊皮卷
苏菲的世界
营销管理
西方哲学史
西方智典
论人类不平等的起源和基础
论法的精神
逻辑学
道德情操论

In-Apps

去除广告
£2.99

Screenshots

西方哲学-经典合集 FAQ

  • Is 西方哲学-经典合集 free?

    Yes, 西方哲学-经典合集 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 西方哲学-经典合集 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 西方哲学-经典合集 cost?

    西方哲学-经典合集 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is £2.99.

  • What is 西方哲学-经典合集 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 西方哲学-经典合集 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

5 out of 5

1 ratings in United Kingdom

5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Ratings History

西方哲学-经典合集 Reviews

No Reviews in United Kingdom
App doesn't have any reviews in United Kingdom yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
381

西方哲学-经典合集 Competitors

Name
鲁迅全集(离线版)
武侠小说精选(离线版)
论语-孔子论语全篇诵读
专业朗读学有声论语
人生必读的经典名著合集-中外精品书籍任你阅读
百科电子书浏览阅读器
中国四大古典名著(离线版)
老舍全集(离线版)
世界名著精选(百部离线版)
國學精選-經史子集四庫全書
中华经典古籍合集: 阅读文言文国学典籍的电子书
古文小说典籍阅读器电子书全集
莎士比亚全集(离线版)

西方哲學-經典合集 Installs

Last 30 days

西方哲學-經典合集 Revenue

Last 30 days

西方哲学-经典合集 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 西方哲學-經典合集 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Books
Publisher
芬霞 方
Languages
Chinese, English
Recent release
2.2 (6 years ago )
Released on
Jun 5, 2016 (8 years ago )
Last Updated
1 week ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.