App is temporarily unavailable

诉问律师

N/A

Published by: Unknown
Downloads
Revenue

Description

诉问律师APP是一款全新的法律服务APP。诉问律师APP由在线法律咨询、委托律师、案件诉讼、代写文书、合同服务、在线普法等多项法律服务功能组成。帮您轻松快速解的决身边的法律问题,诉问律师APP费用低、随时随地想问就问、省时、省力、专业性高、律师资质精准匹配,在测试期间已得到业内专家、政府、及相关媒体的高度认可,目前诉问律师已和全国范围内数百家律所、数万名律师达成战略合作,为超过数十万用户和上千家企业提供法律服务,并受邀担任众多知名企事业单位、政府机关的常年法律顾问。
  诉问律师APP由辽宁诉问法律信息咨询服务有限公司投资开发(简称诉问律师),诉问律师成立于2020年4月,是一家“互联网+法律服务”的综合性法律服务公司,诉问律师为公民以及企事业单位,提供全方位多元化的法律服务,并为实现提高全体公民的法律意识,全面提高社会法制化管理水平做出贡献。
  “要努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中都感受到公平正义”,是习近平总书记对依法治国的重要论述,以公益普法为己任,开创性的提出以用户端、律师端双端口,倾力打造在线课堂,将线上课堂和线下普法相融合,在法律知识共享领域呈现新格局。
Hide Show More...

In-Apps

个人会员套餐一
USD 29.99
个人会员套餐三
USD 209.99
个人会员套餐二
USD 119.99
企业会员套餐一
USD 449.99
企业会员套餐三
USD 999.99
企业会员套餐二
USD 899.99

Screenshots

诉问律师 FAQ

  • Is 诉问律师 free?

    Yes, 诉问律师 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 诉问律师 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 诉问律师 cost?

    诉问律师 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is USD 451.66.

  • What is 诉问律师 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 诉问律师 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Dominican Republic yet.
Ratings History

诉问律师 Reviews

会员随时服务

孤独的人188 on

China

这个软件真心为老百姓服务

非常快速的解决了我的法律问题

羊@兔 on

China

感谢这款产品,真是一款法律的宝藏,果断收藏! 感谢律师帮我解决了问题!太感谢了

诉问律师 Competitors

Name
全民掌上租房
羊儿跑
小金人APP
真能干
五更校园
星往生活
N/A
潘安美
潘安美酒
利达通顾问端
圆梦家
N/A
泰解乏技师端

诉问律师 Installs

Last 30 days

诉问律师 Revenue

Last 30 days

诉问律师 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 诉问律师 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.