刘亚百题

Published by: ya liu
Downloads
Revenue

Description

15年前,我因机缘巧合主持了十多期关于所谓网瘾孩子的封闭训练项目,当时就发现我们可以和那些让家长和老师绝望的孩子在24小时内建立关系并开始沟通,然而我絶望地发现我们完全无力让这些孩子回归家庭和学校。因为我们搞得定孩子却无法改变教师和家长。那时我就确信教师和家长是孩子问题的来源、传递者和放大者,90%的教师和家长或教师和家长90%的言行是不合格的和错误的。并且教师和家长所犯的错误或问题教师和问题家长的问题是一样的,并且只有一个类型、一个方向!许多教师和家长以为的教育言行多数情况下不仅无关教育,而且更多地是在传递焦虑和负面情绪,甚至是逆教育的行为。全社会都在讨论一些假的问题:“孩子究竟是要管松点儿还是该管严点?”“究竟是要快乐学习还是⋯?”其实问题出在我们管孩子的言行绝大多数是错误的,并且这些错误的发生无关学历职业,甚至高学历和教师职业犯错的概率更高。我的问题教师和家长包括心理学科班出身的高校教师、中学特级教师等看起来不应该有的群体。有人问我为什么叫刘亚百题?我自信地告诉提问者说家长和老师说的话不超过一百句,也有人问APP为什么叫语人,我笑而答之:“说人话”。我这里不卖鸡汤,也不争论教育观念、更不会含糊不清地讲一些不着边际的道理,而是明确地告知教师和家长:“how to do!”本系统的定位首先是针对所有教师和家长训练技能-言语技能、说人话的技能!其次其基本原理和规则可扩展至夫妻沟通及所有人际沟通。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

刘亚百题 FAQ

  • Is 刘亚百题 free?

    Yes, 刘亚百题 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 刘亚百题 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 刘亚百题 cost?

    刘亚百题 is free.

  • What is 刘亚百题 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 刘亚百题 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Sweden yet.
Ratings History

刘亚百题 Reviews

No Reviews in Sweden
App doesn't have any reviews in Sweden yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

刘亚百题 Installs

Last 30 days

刘亚百题 Revenue

Last 30 days

刘亚百题 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 刘亚百题 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Education
Publisher
ya liu
Languages
English, Chinese
Recent release
1.4.6 (1 year ago )
Released on
Jul 11, 2019 (5 years ago )
Last Updated
1 month ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.