App is temporarily unavailable

黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】

Published by: 洪波 杨
Downloads
Revenue

Description

《黄帝内经》是我国现存最早的医学文献典籍,是所有学习中医者的必读之书。
本软件具有以下特点:
1、文白对照。文言文和白话文同屏显示,支持对照和交替排版,轻松读阅读中医著作。
2、原文注释。在原文中增加大量注释,点击注释直接查看,难点不再成为障碍,加深阅读理解。
3、真人朗读。真人朗读优美动听,让你在眼睛得到休息的同时通过声音领略经典中医著作的魅力。
4、内置词典。内置文言文字典和高级汉语词典,阅读时遇到难懂的字、词无需联网一查即知。
5、摘录笔记。阅读中可随时将书中内容摘录到笔记中,边学边记,加深理解。
内容推荐
《黄帝内经》包括《素问》和《灵枢》两部分,各八十一篇。《黄帝内经》的学术理论体系是古代医家通过长期的医疗实践,在古代哲学思想指导下形成的。由于其理论体系的科学性和实践性,千百年来有效地指导着中医的临床实践,为中医学的发展奠定了基础。
《黄帝内经·灵枢》共十二卷八十一篇,所论内容十分丰富。该书以整体观念为指导,以阴阳五行学说为依据,较为详尽地论述了人体生理、病理、诊断、治疗和养生的有关问题,全面阐述了五脏六腑、精神气血津液、人体气质类型等内容,成为中医基本理论的渊薮。特别是对经络腧穴理论和针刺方法的记载更为翔实,例如对针法的论述,不仅强调了守神、候气的重要性,而且提出了数十种针刺方法,还详细介绍了针具使用、针刺部位、针刺深浅、针刺禁忌、针刺与四时的关系等内容,为后世针灸学的发展奠定了坚实的基础。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 FAQ

  • Is 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 free?

    Yes, 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 cost?

    黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 is free.

  • What is 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Czechia yet.
Ratings History

黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 Reviews

No Reviews in Czechia
App doesn't have any reviews in Czechia yet.

黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 Installs

Last 30 days

黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 Revenue

Last 30 days

黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 黄帝内经·灵枢【有声典籍 文白对照】 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.