连信

聊天交友工具

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

In-Apps

21连信豆
$2,900.00
56连信豆
$4,900.00
84连信豆
$9,900.00
126连信豆
$17,900.00
3626连信豆
$399,900.00
4886连信豆
$599,900.00
1元特惠礼包
$900.00
超级会员连续包季
$57,900.00
超级会员连续包年
$147,900.00
超级会员连续包月
$21,900.00

Screenshots

连信 FAQ

  • Is 连信 free?

    Yes, 连信 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 连信 legit?

    ⚠️ The 连信 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 连信 cost?

    连信 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $126,400.00.

  • What is 连信 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 连信 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Colombia yet.
Ratings History

连信 Reviews

诈骗勿信

Undc68 on

China

基本没真人,诱导充钱

好APP

wg h l on

China

非常好用

垃圾

哦我来咯拒绝履行咯再聚咯回来了 on

China

垃圾

落寞有 on

China

连个数字都发不出来TM的

垃圾

丁文不败 on

China

垃圾软件

乱封号

838,暖暖的 on

China

垃圾不要用,乱封号

纯垃圾软件,进都进不了

小文文弱弱地说 on

China

经常封号

fhfjfiu on

China

什么话都不能说老是禁言

一点附近人 就给你弹广告

Hisnaokg on

China

垃圾app

莫名其妙被禁言

我觉的装扮少女很有魅力气质高雅。 on

China

动不动就禁言,体验感极差

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings

Keywords

连信 Competitors

Name
爱聊-原陌声交友
聊天交友,就用爱聊
遇见漂流瓶-同城约会找对象
同城交友社交软件
陌陌极速版—直播聊天视频交友
同城视频交友约会
对缘
更真实的恋爱交友平台
趣约会
视频相亲找对象
世纪佳缘-婚恋交友脱单社区
高端相亲会所
百合网-同城聊天交友相亲软件
单身交友相亲脱单平台
珍爱-成就天下姻缘
汇聚海量优质单身用户的专业婚恋平台
MOMO陌陌
一切从陌生开始
Sweetalk
Traducción para llamadas, etc

连信 Installs

Last 30 days

连信 Revenue

Last 30 days

连信 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 连信 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.