桐果

桐果助您通过

Published by: youchengedu

Description

桐果致力于为学员构建求职核心能力、通用能力、职场关键技能在内的三层能力体系;消除信息不对称、职场路径依赖,打破家庭背景、个人所处的物理环境和认知限制,助力学员谋取更广阔职业可能性、迅速提升职场专业性。
提供银行,投行,会计,咨询,快消,证券,保险,房地产,能源,电力,互联网,航空等行业各大公司笔试面试复习课程。
提供求职全过程网申/笔试/面试/职业规划辅导服务。

In-Apps

128学币
79.90 S/
88学币
49.90 S/
50学币
29.90 S/
45学币
22.90 S/
30学币
14.90 S/
388学币
229.90 S/
68学币
39.90 S/
18学币
12.90 S/

Screenshots

桐果 FAQ

  • Is 桐果 free?

    Yes, 桐果 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 桐果 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 桐果 cost?

    桐果 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 60.03 S/.

  • What is 桐果 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 桐果 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Peru yet.
Ratings History

桐果 Reviews

垃圾

早睡早起早睡早起我说爷爷 on

China

题库完全不对啊,和考的完全不一样,我全部看你的资料复习的,结果一丁点用都没有,题型都不一样,你这完全是骗人的呀

非常卡 考点很过时

Your darling Daddy on

China

做卷子的时候一套卷子才做没几道题,卡住四五次,点出去重进不能保存之前的进度,虽然在学习上工作上能得到很多帮助,但是软件实在是太卡太影响使用了,希望能改进。 还有一个最明显的缺陷就是考点特别过时特别偏僻,有几道甚至解析对的答案错的,甚至解析也是一知半解不太正确的,纠错以后也没有客服回应,希望能更新题目和考点,花这点钱买资料不能就买这些吧。

很不错的软件

adebayue on

China

很不错的软件对我帮助很大

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

桐果 Competitors

桐果 Installs

Last 30 days

桐果 Revenue

Last 30 days

桐果 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 桐果 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Education
Publisher
youchengedu
Languages
English, Chinese
Recent release
3.1.5 (1 year ago )
Released on
Nov 6, 2022 (2 years ago )
Last Updated
3 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.