App is temporarily unavailable
Downloads
Revenue

Description

汇聚懂教育的老师,提供轻量化的教学服务。辅助学员进行 学、练、测、评,提供便捷、精准的学习服务。创建拥抱式服务,让用户体验更好!

In-Apps

21学习币
¥700
4.2学习币
¥100
47.6学习币
¥1,500
89.6学习币
¥3,000
229.6学习币
¥7,000
453.6学习币
¥15,000

Screenshots

文墨学堂 FAQ

  • Is 文墨学堂 free?

    Yes, 文墨学堂 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 文墨学堂 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 文墨学堂 cost?

    文墨学堂 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥137.75.

  • What is 文墨学堂 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 文墨学堂 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

文墨学堂 Reviews

骗人的 大家不要相信

我说怎么什么昵称都有人用 on

China

骗子 大家千万不要相信,打着考证的幌子骗钱,后续人都找不到,一定要擦亮眼睛

垃圾骗子,万把块钱

疯😡 on

China

交钱就跑路了

骗子公司

擎宝 on

China

交完钱之后联系不到人了,骗子公司

骗人

京津冀男男女女宝贝 on

China

骗子公司,

骗人的

z1883933 on

China

骗你交钱

这就是个骗人的公司

asdfgyyghjh on

China

交完钱让你下一个APP,然后老师也联系不上电话也联系不上。骗子,大骗子,骗子,大骗子,不得好死。

骗钱公司

630乐团 on

China

本人上当受骗了8000千多

骗钱公司

44433533 on

China

专门以普通话等级考试包过为幌子,全国各地骗钱几千元不等,本人被骗4千元

非常好

楼咯哇,八大 on

China

谢谢老师耐心讲解

文墨学堂 Competitors

Name
91箐学网
阔学培优
阔学培优
开学啦-让学习再快一点
欣瑞教育
新版教师资格和教师编制备考软件
箐鹏课堂
N/A
预见课堂
N/A
社工对题库-社会工作者初级中级考试刷题库
2022社会工作师社工证书考试社区工作者资源库
预考学堂
N/A
聚才木羽
盖特学堂

文墨学堂 Installs

Last 30 days

文墨学堂 Revenue

Last 30 days

文墨学堂 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 文墨学堂 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Education
Languages
Chinese
Recent release
1.0.7 (2 years ago )
Released on
Mar 4, 2022 (2 years ago )
Last Updated
9 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.