Description

高品质课程:医疗名师在线直播,可实时参与互动,体验真实上课场景,让你高效学习,从容备考。
大数据为你个性出题:根据考点,考频,难度智能出题;记录你的练习情况,生成数据报告,预测你的考试得分。
直播课离线下载:消耗流量少,高清画质音质给你舒适体验。错过直播也不怕,所有课程回放,随时随地想看就看。
全面覆盖医学类真题:医疗事业单位招聘、护士资格、执业医师、执业药师、卫生职称等考试真题,各类题目尽收囊中。

In-Apps

卫人医考充值8
$4,900.00
卫人医考充值18
$14,900.00
卫人医考充值50
$29,900.00
卫人医考充值88
$59,900.00
卫人医考充值128
$99,900.00
卫人医考充值168
$119,900.00
卫人医考充值198
$129,900.00
卫人医考充值298
$199,900.00
卫人医考充值388
$299,900.00
卫人医考充值488
$299,900.00

Screenshots

卫人医考 FAQ

  • Is 卫人医考 free?

    Yes, 卫人医考 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 卫人医考 legit?

    ‼️️ The 卫人医考 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 卫人医考 cost?

    卫人医考 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $125,900.00.

  • What is 卫人医考 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 卫人医考 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Colombia yet.
Ratings History

卫人医考 Reviews

题目非常有代表性

cccccydsa on

China

卫人还是一如既往靠谱

推荐一下

Kk额 on

China

很好用的app推荐

卫人app

yeedfy on

China

卫人的app真的做得不错 支持 还有题库呢

好用

完美软件呀 on

China

非常好

好评

成功上岸🏅🎉 on

China

解析很到位,用起来很方便

卫人题库yyds

力量来了! on

China

考编好助手

啥名 啊 on

China

帮助很大

题很全面,有利于及时掌握课本知识点

爱 你哟😘 on

China

很好

很棒

gshjsyevb on

China

很不错,很有用

非常👍

S松烟入墨 on

China

每一题都有解析,刷题更直观,还有计时功能控制做题速度!

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

卫人医考 Competitors

卫人医考 Installs

Last 30 days

卫人医考 Revenue

Last 30 days

卫人医考 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 卫人医考 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.