App is temporarily unavailable

Description

“掌上华医”APP软件是为全国卫生技术人员提供教育培训、技能训练以及医学资讯等服务的一体化平台。满足卫生技术人员在移动互联网时代的需求。

掌上华医 FAQ

  • Is 掌上华医 free?

    Yes, 掌上华医 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 掌上华医 legit?

    ⚠️ The 掌上华医 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 掌上华医 cost?

    掌上华医 is free.

  • What is 掌上华医 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 掌上华医 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Chile yet.
Ratings History

掌上华医 Reviews

垃圾

22399319 on

China

圈钱的垃圾

请适配一下ios18,ai问答以后每次返回都卡死

matinal_ on

China

同上,ai问答别一个一个字往外蹦

垃圾

1554631 on

China

垃圾玩意坑我们钱的

华医网si吧 on

China

垄断市场坑钱

这种垃圾软件

五天2025 on

China

医生们平时工作这么忙搞这种软件

体验很差

黑天鹅的舞台 on

China

不能拖动,可以理解,但是没有倍速,这是劝退的节奏啊,毕竟不止你一家在做,现阶段看视频,不能倍速,真是神坑

垃圾平台收钱不办事

尼泊尔王国国王卡梅勒和美!你们 on

China

垃圾平台收钱不办事

什么傻卵玩意?

李叠爹 on

China

板块都不齐全,公需课也看不了,就上架来appstore狠狠的圈医护人员的钱了是吧?评论里5星的都是什么逆天玩意我就不多说了,圈钱玩意四个🐎不过分吧?

赚钱的玩意儿

一个苦医生 on

China

搞个这种东西赚钱就罢了,东西下载还这么慢,软件使用这么不流畅,年年搞些劳神的东西,完全是内耗

垃圾软件

卡死了🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 on

China

浪费时间

Keywords

掌上华医 Competitors

Name
壹生-医生壹生的学习伴侣
医学电子书包
融学
医学考研、执业医师、规培、主治医师、三基、中医执业医师、护考
护资、初级护师、护理考研、主管护师、护理专升本、口腔执业医师
考试宝典-医考题库医学教育医师助手
专注卫生职称考试,海量医师/药师/护师/医技课程
欣师网校
才士考试题库
数字住培-住院医师规范化培训学习平台
医博士
博鳌医学
外科医生感兴趣的内容都在这里

掌上华医 Installs

Last 30 days

掌上华医 Revenue

Last 30 days

掌上华医 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 掌上华医 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Education
Languages
English
Recent release
4.68.11 (3 weeks ago )
Released on
Jun 29, 2014 (10 years ago )
Also available in
China
Last Updated
11 hours ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.