上观新闻-阅读上海的第一选择

Published by: 解放日报社

Description

上观新闻App是由上海报业集团旗下解放日报社、文汇报社、新民晚报社三大报社联合推出的新闻阅读类旗舰型客户端,是上海时政、人文、民生新闻的头部报道平台。上观新闻立足上海,放眼世界,依托三大报全媒体优质内容生产团队,通过新闻快报、深度调查、数据分析、热点评论、现场直播等多种形式,为用户提供政治、经济、文化、社会等领域的权威资讯和朝花、笔会、夜光杯等精品美文深度阅读。

Screenshots

上观新闻 FAQ

  • Is 上观新闻 free?

    Yes, 上观新闻 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 上观新闻 legit?

    ⚠️ The 上观新闻 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 上观新闻 cost?

    上观新闻 is free.

  • What is 上观新闻 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 上观新闻 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in South Korea yet.
Ratings History

上观新闻 Reviews

新闻真实可信,希望内容更丰富

huayang2786 on

China

假新闻满天飞的时代,这个客户端很靠谱,都是真新闻

新闻内容差

班诺波罗蜜 on

China

新闻内容差,乱写

强迫下载答题的垃圾货

idjihienibdibdknken on

China

强迫下载答题的垃圾

强制推广

人间三 on

China

强制推广答题,答题又必须下载app。花几年几百万做出一个没人用的APP,完了还要花手段强制推广,恶心恶心恶心。捞钱就捞钱,低调一点不行吗。

强迫下载

颜飞机 on

China

别强迫下载

垃圾

艾蕴 on

China

不好不好不好

垃圾

uayayayshdjingjingjing on

China

强制使用该软件答题

垃圾软件,没有之一

Nike001234 on

China

垃圾软件

垃圾

深刻的嘞 on

China

垃圾东西,垃圾手段,狗东西

强制推广的垃圾

swjjxm on

China

强制推广的垃圾类应用

Store Rankings

Ranking History
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
230
Top Free
324
Top Free
352
Top Free
406
Top Free
410

Keywords

上观新闻 Competitors

Name
中新网
中新网
文汇-华语新闻热点资讯
华语世界高品质人文阅读平台
海南日报—读懂海南,看我的!
劳动观察
看看新闻-叩击时代
原创视频新闻的新媒体平台
徐汇通
浦东观察
周到上海 - 新周到心青年,50+海派生活指南
新闻晨报官方客户端
新民-新闻资讯阅读社区
热度新闻轻松在手
上海静安
足不出户,晓知静安

上观新闻 Installs

Last 30 days

上观新闻 Revenue

Last 30 days

上观新闻 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 上观新闻 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.