鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全

Published by: 建华 王

Description

张震中国恐怖文化的代表,最流行的恐怖夜故事,唯一集创作、讲述,制作于一身的恐怖有声文学创作人,用声音完成恐怖,让耳朵听从惊吓!
中国民间一直流传着很多超级恐怖鬼故事,你通过多少民间鬼故事?你印象中的中国鬼故事是有多恐怖?
鬼故事又称为恐怖故事,恐怖小说,鬼怪故事。鬼故事是以(推理、穿越、血腥、架空、恐怖、刺激)等风格模式构成的虚幻故事。是一种与灵异事件有关的故事。灵异故事口耳相传,造成另一种流行文化,当中不少亦是著名的都市传奇。灵异故事可以涉及人类与灵体的接触甚至被附身;又或涉及一些通灵的方法如问米、碟仙等。由于其戏剧性,灵异故事一直也是电影以及话剧的重要题材。
同时鬼故事也是恐怖故事、恐怖小说、鬼怪故事。鬼,又称亡灵,传说是死亡所留下的的魂魄,常被认为是死人的幽灵。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 FAQ

  • Is 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 free?

    Yes, 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 cost?

    鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 is free.

  • What is 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 Reviews

好听

*,ke!ton¥ on

China

好听

还可以

tyallgod on

China

还可以

杂音太多

.🌫️. on

China

太糊了还没听就删了

一般

赵晓莹4S on

China

一般般 说话听不清 音乐声音太大了

杂音太多了

凌宛月 on

China

从没听过杂音这么多的鬼故事app

太恐怖了

/请叫我雷锋/ on

China

吓死我了,故事很多,很真实,就感觉在旁边似的

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 Installs

Last 30 days

鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 Revenue

Last 30 days

鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 鬼故事-恐怖张震讲鬼故事有声大全 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Shopping
Publisher
建华 王
Languages
English
Recent release
1.6 (8 years ago )
Released on
Mar 8, 2017 (8 years ago )
Last Updated
2 weeks ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.