多问律师端

20多万律师都在用!

Downloads
Revenue

Description

多问律师端是律师一站式移动办公软件,全国20多万律师都在用!多问律师端为律师提供了工具和接案两大功能。
1.工具:诉讼费、律师费、贷款利息、等计算工具,提高了律师的办公效率;
2.接案:当事人的法律咨询、诉讼案件等,提高了律师的接案收入。

Screenshots

多问律师端 FAQ

  • Is 多问律师端 free?

    Yes, 多问律师端 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 多问律师端 legit?

    ⚠️ The 多问律师端 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 多问律师端 cost?

    多问律师端 is free.

  • What is 多问律师端 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 多问律师端 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

多问律师端 Reviews

太差

六六两马被谁急台 on

China

骗子公司,全款市场,注销不了

一星都不想给

余馥 on

China

疯狂发短信

垃圾软件

垃圾软件耽误时间 on

China

垃圾软件垃圾到爆

打个高分,请给我多派点质量好的案子

阿拉辣辣了 on

China

打个高分,请给我多派点质量好的案子🤔🤔🤔

很难使用

视频小芭比 on

China

咨询基本无效,app不优化,僵尸软件和垃圾团队

垃圾

噓。 on

China

垃圾

很好用

四川杨洲律师 on

China

很喜欢

1分都给多了

Mr.Raison on

China

案源质量奇差无比,软件做的也很low,试用一年够够的了,提个现还要审核还要凑整数,浪费几千块

白嫖的人,在这里是尊贵的客户

Abel365 on

China

白嫖的咨询者,一分钱不付,律师还得给他咨询半小时,然后回慢了他还不满意,还给你差评。要想好的服务,却不愿意付钱。呵呵呵。垃圾。

账号怎么注销?没找到注销的地方

用过吗?没有 on

China

账号怎么注销?找不到注销的地方…

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

多问律师端 Competitors

Name
Nutstore-Cloud Storage&Backup
Secure file sync, share
Law Wit
法蝉
智能化律师办案工具
案件云
法律人首选的案件管理云平台
就问-律师端
法天使
让中国合同库成为标准
百事通法服
CS Scanner-スキャン アプリ
OCR 文書 写真編集 PDF作成
裁判文书-法律案例文书查询
全国判决文书、文书网司法案例查询
上海律师

多问律师端 Installs

Last 30 days

多问律师端 Revenue

Last 30 days

多问律师端 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 多问律师端 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.