风险预控(云酷)

风险预控app

Downloads
Revenue

Description

风险预控APP 平台通过动态标准安措库、电子化风控等信息手段,形成涵盖标准库维护、现场作业风控学习、现场风控考试、现场安全痕迹记录、事故分析与追溯等多功能的APP平台,有效解决现场风险识别、现场作业安全执行监督以及安全管理责任划分与追溯的管理目标,使安全管理落到实处、变被动安全为主动安全。

Screenshots

风险预控(云酷) FAQ

  • Is 风险预控(云酷) free?

    Yes, 风险预控(云酷) is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 风险预控(云酷) legit?

    ⚠️ The 风险预控(云酷) app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 风险预控(云酷) cost?

    风险预控(云酷) is free.

  • What is 风险预控(云酷) revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 风险预控(云酷) app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Belarus yet.
Ratings History

风险预控(云酷) Reviews

恶心

6467873436484 on

China

形式主义的产物,推卸责任利器

还要上传身份证

莫斯科索ksks on

China

还要上传个人信息 怕泄露个人信息

形式主义的产物

6467873436484 on

China

形式主义的产物

形式主义

477983780 on

China

呵呵你个der. 求才知道这是个啥东西

使用很方便

巴拉巴拉的小推车 on

China

用起来很顺手,再接再厉

卡卡

夜尽天明吧 on

China

风险选择时候是真的卡,体验不如安卓,全面屏适配不好。

软件有待开发

简称我自己 on

China

软件更新bug多 感觉开发者不专业 希望回家好好学一下体育 鸡肋

垃圾软件

哑剧啊啊啊 on

China

形式主义,搞笑

按规定评分?

AK47小赌徒 on

China

评你二大爷,打字都卡的垃圾软件,还腆脸要评分?就是不能评负星,不然大哥让你负到底

差评

toy7562 on

China

甚也玩意儿,形式主义!

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

风险预控(云酷) Installs

Last 30 days

风险预控(云酷) Revenue

Last 30 days

风险预控(云酷) Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 风险预控(云酷) performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Business
Languages
English, Chinese
Recent release
2.2.6 (2 weeks ago )
Released on
Sep 17, 2019 (5 years ago )
Last Updated
2 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.