可栗口语 - AI外教情景对话,零基础练发音学语法

汇编全集

Published by: 宏香 金

Description

收录2000多部常用中华人民共和国法律法规及司法解释等,分类浏览,便捷操作,快速索引定位,全文搜索,书签收藏!
软件特色:
1. 法律法规详细分类,一键查找
2. 全文检索,标题与章节检索
3. 快速索引定位
4. 升级功能后可一键复制相关条款,并发送给指定邮箱
适合法律专业者随身查找使用,比如律师,法律学者,法律专业学生,公务员考试等。
法律大类一览:
国际法、行政及行政诉讼、经济法、民法、民事诉讼及仲裁、商法、司法制度及法职、宪法、刑法、刑事诉讼、劳动法等。

Screenshots

可栗口语 FAQ

  • Is 可栗口语 free?

    可栗口语 is not free (it costs 179.00), however it doesn't contain in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 可栗口语 legit?

    🤔 The 可栗口语 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 可栗口语 cost?

    The price of 可栗口语 is 179.00.

  • What is 可栗口语 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 可栗口语 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Mexico yet.
Ratings History

可栗口语 Reviews

更新以后一直闪退

体验很差体验很差体验很差体验很差 on

China

如题

增加法条

15577904 on

China

建议加入公安接报案工作规定

更新以后一直闪退

皮皮36749392 on

China

闪退

非常好+小建议

Everleaf on

China

该软件可以离线使用,相较法宝等等搜索很快,非常不错!!建议开发者也给出Mac电脑版软件,更加方便多设备协同工作,谢谢,望采纳!

建议对已失效法律法规做出明确标注和提示

Kristal~376 on

China

使用过程中发现,已失效的法律法规没有进行标注和提示,容易造成饮用错误,建议对已失效法律法规做出明确标注和提示

很多法规没有

去散有时 on

China

更新也不及时

怎么不能搜索了呢?

没钱充点电吧 on

China

如题

MAC版

東风舞无雾 on

China

建议支持一下MAC版

搜索检索功能失效

来盒玉溪 on

China

搜索检索功能失效了,无反应

2025年开始不更新新法条了吗

wushanxhy on

China

民法典婚姻家庭编解释二已经施行了一个月看着app里还没有更新

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
81

法律法规及司法解释速查工具 Installs

Last 30 days

法律法规及司法解释速查工具 Revenue

Last 30 days

可栗口语 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 法律法规及司法解释速查工具 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.