爱奇艺体育-英超足球赛事全程高清直播

足球网球高尔夫搏击热门比赛

Downloads
Revenue

Description

N/A

Screenshots

Loading...
Please wait..

爱奇艺体育 FAQ

  • Is 爱奇艺体育 free?

    Yes, 爱奇艺体育 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 爱奇艺体育 legit?

    ⚠️ The 爱奇艺体育 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 爱奇艺体育 cost?

    爱奇艺体育 is free.

  • What is 爱奇艺体育 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 爱奇艺体育 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Germany yet.
Ratings History

爱奇艺体育 Reviews

垃圾

senhe on

China

垃圾软件,广告弹个不停,看个视频还不能锁屏,没有播放记录,更没有下载,流量观看还强制自动播放,真个是无耻平台。

垃圾中的垃圾

互通有无QQ on

China

兼职就是为了看广告设计的一款APP,吃相太难看,服务器慢的要死,就像高中生设计出来的玩意,真给我恶心到了

沃尔沃沃尔沃沃尔沃.......

爷给宁🐴来亿拳 on

China

离了沃尔沃不会说话了?

广告多

复制弹窗 on

China

广告多

iPad什么时候适配横屏主界面?

人生太短事太多 on

China

我用了几年了还是不能横屏啊😩

苏东不滚永远不用这个app

垃圾服不建议玩 on

China

苏东这玩意也能当解说?这垃圾app谁爱用谁用

垃圾

Leslie_01Yeung on

China

垃圾软件付费都有bug,垃圾解说全场胡诌。

爱奇艺体育的横蛮

jayleung on

China

前几年爱奇艺还没有这么稳定的直播技术,都是看着一路现在直播线路稳定起来的,当时同一个服务多次收费我在弹幕说了敏感内容,现在每个月收我钱,禁我言!真的不能忍了,停止订阅删除

登陆不了,飞舞

1043335496 on

China

登陆不了

垃圾

1314966z on

China

转播不会做天天搞一些业余的评论和说球,玩网红那一套恶心人

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Grossing
22
Top Grossing
27
Top Free
44
Top Free
48
Top Grossing
57

Keywords

爱奇艺体育 Installs

Last 30 days

爱奇艺体育 Revenue

Last 30 days

爱奇艺体育 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 爱奇艺体育 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.