伴鱼阅读营-原版英语分级阅读

领跑新课标,最合适中国孩子的英语分级阅读产品!

Description

伴鱼旗下品牌伴鱼阅读营——
【正版独家读物】
精选全球经典、有趣的儿童英语读物,通过生动有趣的视频&音频讲解,带领孩子领略故事的精彩、享受阅读的乐趣,同时体会英文的魅力!
【先进的阅读理念】
根据分级阅读的理念,将精选的上千册读物进行科学合理的匹配和分级,由专业教研团队打磨。内容由超人气IP“Tina大王”全程双语领读,让英文阅读有滋有味。
【阅读营独有的英语定级】
给每一个体验阅读营的孩子提供一次免费的英语阅读定级测试,来评测孩子的英语水平,根据孩子的英语水平来上不同级别的阅读课。
【科学的英语规划】
通过科学的规划,让不同年龄段的孩子都能读到合适的分级读物,同时伴鱼阅读营已经为孩子搭配好了完整的英语分级阅读课程,共8个级别,上千节课程,可供孩子学习。
【陪伴孩子成长】
孩子听音频,读纸书,品味书香,在潜移默化中养成阅读习惯,循序渐进,从0基础一步步的成为英语达人!
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

伴鱼阅读营 FAQ

  • Is 伴鱼阅读营 free?

    Yes, 伴鱼阅读营 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 伴鱼阅读营 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 伴鱼阅读营 cost?

    伴鱼阅读营 is free.

  • What is 伴鱼阅读营 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 伴鱼阅读营 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Estonia yet.
Ratings History

伴鱼阅读营 Reviews

磨耳朵模块没有搜索功能

78“hfgbji on

China

磨耳朵模块没有搜索功能,我的课程没有搜索功能,找课要从头到尾找一遍,很落后,什么时候能加上搜索功能?

差评,明知道在试用,上课期间,还一直打电话,不知道咋想的,这app的销售不知道脑子咋想的,一直打电话打电话……差评

12125866399 on

China

差评,差评

小孩子很喜欢

甘甘小小幺 on

China

小孩子在学英语,家里也有很多绘本书,但是自己读效率还是低了些,在阅读营上面跟着Tina读了几本大猫的绘本,孩子很喜欢,推荐

垃圾软件

照妖静😀 on

China

垃圾软件!无缘无故扣我钱,我都没有预约什么活动,点进软件想查看是啥活动结果什么也不显示,账号还注销不掉,账户内啥课程没有非说我有精品课要处理,太坑了

真的有帮助到我家小孩

VY846 on

China

自己确实没有能力帮助娃读英文绘本,总怕带跑偏了,在这个软件里有老师帮忙带读讲绘本真的是太方便了

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

伴鱼阅读营 Installs

Last 30 days

伴鱼阅读营 Revenue

Last 30 days

伴鱼阅读营 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 伴鱼阅读营 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.