跳棋大师 - 培养非凡棋力 提升棋艺 训练毅力耐性脑力牌品

神级电脑波子棋高手 单机对打可多至六人同时玩乐十分有趣耐玩

Published by: Oscar Tsang

Description

"跳棋" 或叫"波子棋"、"中国跳棋" 是一种传统游戏,差不多人人小时候都一定玩过。
这个游戏名为“跳棋大师”,因为我们开发出一个非常强劲的电脑玩家。
有多强? 强对你不相信! 你可以和它或其他朋友一起玩。
这个游戏设计得很灵活,你可以自由配置0到6个真人玩家来玩游戏。
为什么可以没有真人?因你可以只设置电脑玩家,它会演示给你看这个游戏如何玩!
有关游戏规则的更多细则,你可以看看百度百科:
百度百科:http://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%B7%B3%E6%A3%8B
特点:
- 灵活放置棋子
- 强大的电脑玩家
- 最多六人同时玩
- 全立体3D设计

In-Apps

移除广告
¥15.00

Screenshots

跳棋大师 FAQ

  • Is 跳棋大师 free?

    Yes, 跳棋大师 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 跳棋大师 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 跳棋大师 cost?

    跳棋大师 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥15.00.

  • What is 跳棋大师 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 跳棋大师 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3.85 out of 5

60 ratings in China

5 star
38
4 star
3
3 star
4
2 star
2
1 star
13
Ratings History

跳棋大师 Reviews

建议

tqdgaaa on

China

可否一次性将该棋所有路径都标出?

电脑太蠢了

叠被子的时候 on

China

我35步电脑71步

机器随便挑哦啊哦,玩家啊跳不了

小小墨 on

China

糟透了

垃圾游戏

永远的守望者Max on

China

根本不按标准跳棋规则

骗钱

被气爆的xixi on

China

画面简单,音乐奇怪,步骤复杂,不人性化都算了,简直浪费时间,玩这游戏,手都累垮了!不可以联网,简直就是欺诈,无良商家!不用钱都没有人会玩!

垃圾玩意

超级好用你说呢 on

China

不解释……

$$俺$$ on

China

无良商家,18无购买了,还有广告缠绕,被匆悠了,被骗了,果断删除。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
180
Top Paid
331
Top Paid
442

Keywords

跳棋大师 Installs

Last 30 days

跳棋大师 Revenue

Last 30 days

跳棋大师 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 跳棋大师 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.