象棋大師--殘局燒腦,休閒益智

Published by: 博 王

Description

象棋是一種提升思維能力的棋類遊戲。中國象棋歷史悠久,有著極其深厚的文化底蘊。這款全新的象棋遊戲,不僅有經典的對弈模式可供選擇,也有最考驗邏輯思維的殘局模式,更有趣味橫生的暗棋在等待你。
=====================================
【產品特點】
1.純正血統的中國象棋,古色古香的遊戲畫面,讓你在開動腦筋的同時,領略中華文化的博大精深。
2.難易級別的層層遞進,無限燒腦的你,會在這裡完成一場新手到高手的華麗蛻變。
3.挑戰殘局,是中國象棋的精髓所在。象棋名譜,棋聖非你莫屬!

Screenshots

象棋大師- FAQ

  • Is 象棋大師- free?

    Yes, 象棋大師- is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 象棋大師- legit?

    🤔 The 象棋大師- app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 象棋大師- cost?

    象棋大師- is free.

  • What is 象棋大師- revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 象棋大師- app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Türkiye yet.
Ratings History

象棋大師- Reviews

182 关 求破解

脑子不够用1989 on

China

一炮 破三兵 作者是怎么过的

人机bug

Bennetthjw on

China

第七十一关要输了就一直将军我耍赖皮,这人机也是没谁了,谁过得了哦!

头疼

Gcdhvdgg on

China

56关怎么过啊……

71关我过了

乌合之众班长whzzbz on

China

我看到有个人在5月10号发的,250回合就不赖将了,将信将疑。但是还是耐心让他将军了半个钟头左右,最后到240多回合不赖将了,我是244步过的。可以找我确认,乌合之众班长whzzbz

弟弟软件

软件设计……辣几 on

China

赖将 一直将?

71关无限赖将解决方法

我需要休息一下 on

China

回合限制是255 大概走到251回合 它就不会赖将了

71关,修复,修复呀

谁,是谁唯一 on

China

71关,无底线赖将,干啥呀,修复一下呀,

闯关破局:三国十雄138关

马化腾他老祖宗 on

China

黑方长将不停,此软件漏洞没设置长将规则。

什么情况?谁来解答一下

563937857 on

China

巾帼英豪37关红士怎么摆在黑方士角,怎么破的

垃圾

qihagrjduehjaidh on

China

71关黑方无限癞将,垃圾

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

象棋大師- Installs

Last 30 days

象棋大師- Revenue

Last 30 days

象棋大師- Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 象棋大師- performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.