Description

“嘉州通”移动出行服务平台,旨在为乐山用户提供乘车二维码、实时公交、公交卡充值、敬老卡年检、充值查询等服务,使用嘉州通,出行更便捷。
【扫码乘车】一码在手,公交乘车快人一步。
【畅行无忧】再也不用为没带零钱而烦恼,说走就走。
【公交卡充值】公交卡在线充值、订单查询,告别排队。
【实时公交】查看公交路线、车辆位置,出门不再匆忙。
【敬老卡年检】关爱老人,高效便捷,让“数据”多跑路,让老年人少跑路。

Screenshots

嘉州通 FAQ

  • Is 嘉州通 free?

    Yes, 嘉州通 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 嘉州通 legit?

    ⚠️ The 嘉州通 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 嘉州通 cost?

    嘉州通 is free.

  • What is 嘉州通 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 嘉州通 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Spain yet.
Ratings History

嘉州通 Reviews

为啥iphone不支持充值公交卡安?

我仿古家具 on

China

机型14pro 有nfc 但是点进去主页没有公交卡充值这个选项,点老年卡那个进去显示我没有nfc?????

我专门来想骂两句,结果已经许多人骂了

专门来给好评,才能看内容 on

China

这玩意儿为什么这么垃圾?三天两头刷不起,反正你们怎么解释也没用了……什么app会这样经常不能刷?是因为这个是提前充值的吗---反正钱已经充入,刷不刷得了关我司什么事?如果真是为了方便群众,建议你们维护人员还是尽量去读一年专科吧……不然一点都玩不转,这工资拿得也安心?

垃圾

哦买嘎了了 on

China

很服气,抖音都能刷,乘车码用不起,说网络不给力

别用嘉州通

cazgshsjok on

China

别用嘉州通!根本退不了钱,骗子软件

乘车码

姐姐九点半就睡觉睡觉 on

China

余额低于五元不生成乘车码

欺诈

交电话费会儿 on

China

垃圾APP,充值必须充5块钱以上,卡里余额不足五元还不能用,也不能退钱

垃圾app

行第一站坡共鸣的 on

China

还必须5元起充

重复扣费

裙子、围巾 on

China

服了,坐在办公室里,给我扣了公交的费用,咋了,我分身去刷卡了

什么时候才能支持NFC充值

😱😨😰🖕🏻 on

China

隔壁安卓已经可以了

垃圾软件

正义人11111 on

China

不行就别搞这高级的,人家都是支付宝,你就是非要专门弄个这个app,付款又付不了,有延迟,很垃圾,赶紧注销吧!!!!!

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

嘉州通 Installs

Last 30 days

嘉州通 Revenue

Last 30 days

嘉州通 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 嘉州通 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.