App is temporarily unavailable

古典言情小说

N/A

Published by: Guoli Jian
Downloads
Revenue

Description

古典言情小说以描写日常生活为主,以《金瓶梅》最着名。
《金瓶梅》是中国第一部文人独立创作的长篇白话世情章回小说。成书约在明朝隆庆至万历年间,作者署名兰陵笑笑生。《金瓶梅》借《水浒传》中武松杀嫂一段故事为引子,通过对兼有官僚、恶霸、富商三种身份的封建时代市侩势力的代表人物西门庆及其家庭罪恶生活的描述,揭露了明代中叶社会的黑暗和腐败,具有较深刻的认识价值。
《续金瓶梅》全书六十四回,明遗民丁耀亢着。述《金瓶梅》主要人物托生再世、以了前世因果报应故事。全书以《太上感应篇》为说,每回前有引子,叙劝善戒淫说;以宋金征战为历史背景,描摹金人南下、汉人受苦之状颇多,甚为动人;然因有影射明清易帜现实之嫌,丁耀亢以此罹祸下狱。
《欢喜冤家》又名《贪欢报》、《欢喜奇观》,为西湖渔隐主人所作。全书24回,每回演一个故事,集中描写了各种曲折奇异的婚姻悲喜剧,生动展示了明代社会形形色色的人情世态既有对青年男女追求爱情自由所表示的同情;也有对禁欲主义虚伪性的大胆揭露;还有对女性独立人格及聪明才智的充分肯定。曾在清代被多次禁毁。
《醋葫芦》,明代小说,中国古代十大禁书之一,四卷二十回。首序有 “笔耕山房醉心西湖心月主人题” 字样,其作者所着尚有《弁而钗》、《宜春香质》等小说,但其真实姓名及生平不可考。叙都氏性妒及其家庭纠葛事。文中曾引用明戏曲家吴炳《疗妒羹》传奇中的某些段略。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

古典言情小说 FAQ

  • Is 古典言情小说 free?

    Yes, 古典言情小说 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 古典言情小说 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 古典言情小说 cost?

    古典言情小说 is free.

  • What is 古典言情小说 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 古典言情小说 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

古典言情小说 Reviews

No Reviews in Japan
App doesn't have any reviews in Japan yet.

古典言情小说 Installs

Last 30 days

古典言情小说 Revenue

Last 30 days

古典言情小说 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 古典言情小说 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Books
Publisher
Guoli Jian
Languages
English, Chinese, Chinese
Recent release
1.2 (2 years ago )
Released on
Apr 26, 2022 (2 years ago )
Last Updated
1 year ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.