木業傳說:血繼輪回

Description

木業傳說:血繼輪回
- 短介绍 -
正統授權的忍者遊戲,見證傳說的終極對決!
- 長介绍 –
經典日漫火影的橫版戰鬥卡牌游戲,無論劇情,人物,場景,忍術都做到原汁原味,致敬經典,完美重現忍界大戰,親臨大戰與第七班攜手改變戰局。
【極致戰鬥,沉浸體驗】
3D 模型人物打造流暢細緻的戰鬥畫面,展現原著震撼的戰鬥劇情;極致細膩的戰鬥技能特效,在動態特效的效果中刻畫出人物角色的特點。
【本命卡牌,策略佈陣】
培養只屬于你的本命角色!覺醒后還能解鎖特殊形態!足夠的戰場自由度,勝負總在變幻之間,如何佈陣將會是你獲勝的關鍵!
【締結契約,組建戰隊】
超人氣角色陸續登場,數百名強大的忍者已經準備好與你並肩作戰!職業相克、卡牌羈絆、專屬招式,根據戰況調整戰術,選擇最合適的忍者組合,激戰就此開展!
【熱血激鬥,暢爽體驗】
對戰一觸即發,你只需搭配良好的陣容便可一旁觀戰!流暢打鬥畫面、華麗的特效、流暢的招式讓每一場對戰都充滿熱血激情。
【福利狂歡,免費領取】
大量專屬禮包、限時禮包、開服禮包通通免費獲取,還有超多好玩的福利活動,保證你血賺不虧!
【聯繫我們】
請在臉書粉專上關注並聯繫我們。
【溫馨提示】
*本遊戲為免費使用
*請注意遊戲使用時間,避免沉迷於遊戲
Hide Show More...

In-Apps

商品1
29.00 ฿
商品12
79.00 ฿
商品18
99.00 ฿
商品25
149.00 ฿
商品30
199.00 ฿
商品60
299.00 ฿
商品98
499.00 ฿
商品198
999.00 ฿
商品328
1,990.00 ฿
商品648
3,990.00 ฿

木業傳說:血繼輪回 FAQ

  • Is 木業傳說:血繼輪回 free?

    Yes, 木業傳說:血繼輪回 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 木業傳說:血繼輪回 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 木業傳說:血繼輪回 cost?

    木業傳說:血繼輪回 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 833.20 ฿.

  • What is 木業傳說:血繼輪回 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 木業傳說:血繼輪回 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Thailand yet.
Ratings History

木業傳說:血繼輪回 Reviews

App doesn't have any reviews yet

木業傳說:血繼輪回 Competitors

木業傳說:血繼輪回 Installs

Last 30 days

木業傳說:血繼輪回 Revenue

Last 30 days

木業傳說:血繼輪回 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 木業傳說:血繼輪回 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Games
Languages
English
Recent release
1.1 (1 year ago )
Released on
Jul 11, 2023 (1 year ago )
Last Updated
1 month ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.