AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム-VR育児どうぶつの森

キッズ3Dモデル動物園,2-6歳の啓発教育

Description

推奨事項:
1.子供には両親が同伴する必要があり、親子の交流体験が向上します。
2.この製品には空のシーンの方が適しています。また、仮想動物園が屋内に咲く可能性があります。
3.豊かな質感と無反射の平面では、AR位置決めがより正確になります
----------連絡先の詳細----------
メール:[email protected]
WeChat:areu2018

In-Apps

永久解锁
¥1.50
试玩AR动物园
¥100.00

Screenshots

AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム FAQ

  • Is AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム free?

    Yes, AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム legit?

    ‼️️ The AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム cost?

    AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥50.75.

  • What is AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

3 out of 5

4 ratings in Japan

5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
2
Ratings History

AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム Reviews

快乐、一 on

China

能不能做成全中文版的

啊啊啊冰与火兔火锅 on

China

建议一下把里面动物的英文发音去掉 做成全中文的

太好玩了!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

45559868 on

China

海洋生物恐龙都有

不错不错

番番1903 on

China

软件效果很好

还不错,远古生物种类多一点就更好了

尹茜美子 on

China

还不错,远古生物种类多一点就更好了

喜欢

sherobester on

China

喜欢

好玩

优胜教师 on

China

非常好玩!

哈哈哈哈

咿咿呀呀一个哥哥哥哥哥哥哥哥哈哈哈哈 on

China

好玩

喜欢

没有带发卡的卡戴珊 on

China

非常好

评价一下,还行还行。

我是壮壮大人 on

China

还行还行吧。

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

AR森林动物园模拟器 Installs

Last 30 days

AR森林动物园模拟器 Revenue

Last 30 days

AR子供恐竜動物園ゲーム Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into AR森林动物园模拟器 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.