Architectural Digest

Downloads
Revenue

Description

Architectural Digest (AD), the international authority on design and architecture, offers exclusive access to the world’s most beautiful homes and the fascinating people who live in them. Bringing its audience a wealth of information on architecture and interior design, art and antiques, travel destinations, and extraordinary products, its AD100 list of top architects and designers is one of the industry’s most relied-upon indexes of talent.
The Architectural Digest digital edition app is free to download. Subscribers receive unlimited access. Non-subscribers may access a selection of complimentary articles each month.
AUTOMATIC-RENEWAL: Your payment method will be automatically charged at the frequency and price noted in the subscription offer you select, until you cancel. To cancel, you must update your App Store Subscriptions settings at least 24 hours before the end of the current subscription term. No refunds once payment is made.
Hide Show More...

In-Apps

June 2015
¥900.00
March 2015
¥900.00
January 2020
¥1.20
December 2013
¥900.00
December 2014
¥900.00
September 2012
¥900.00
September 2016
¥900.00
One Year Subscription
¥3.60
One Month Subscription
¥360.00
Discounted Subscription Holiday 2015
¥1.80

Screenshots

Architectural Digest FAQ

  • Is Architectural Digest free?

    Yes, Architectural Digest is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is Architectural Digest legit?

    ⚠️ The Architectural Digest app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does Architectural Digest cost?

    Architectural Digest has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥576.66.

  • What is Architectural Digest revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of Architectural Digest app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

Architectural Digest Reviews

Only for subscription through Apple Store

Hermès Boy on

United States

Used to use this app a couple of years ago and loved the layout & functionality. Just renewed my subscription directly through AD, but the app will not recognize my new subscription account. The “Link print subscription” option only displays my old expired subscriptions. AD’s tech support can’t do anything about the issue….

$7.99 monthly cost?

Nina~Bug on

United States

I love the digital magazine. My only concern is that my I-phone app does not advise of the cost in the app description. Only AFTER I downloaded it was I informed of a $7.99 monthly cost. Hidden costs like this take up space on my I phone!

Won’t link to print edition

DelafieldDan on

United States

As others have stated, this still won’t link to your print edition. Many people have reported this and they do nothing. Very frustrating.

Terrible App for AD

ERoman2 on

United States

No landscape view and can’t even verify my subscription information. Please hire a good developer

Still doesn’t link to print subscription

Jadwin on

United States

Links to reset your account password, or link print subscription are non-functional, as ever. .

Landscape mode please!!

carmz457 on

United States

The three stars is solely for the app and not the content of the magazine. A feature that is not currently available for this app, but absolutely should be, is the landscape mode. Inability to see an entire image of a two-page layout (which is typically used for the featured article) is incredibly disappointing and frustrating. Even on a one page layout, you are constrained to the width of portrait mode when zooming in on a landscape photograph. Please, please, please add this feature and I will update this review immediately.

Convoluted Subscription Sign Up Process

Cinder05 on

United States

Very difficult to sign up for a subscription. My card was charged before I submitted any of my my sign in credentials , now I cannot sign in . It really should not be this difficult to subscribe .

most unintuitive and frustrating app I have ever used

suelaconsuela on

United States

most unintuitive and frustrating app. Impossible to navigate

Great Magazine App

wehokev on

United States

I still get the paper copy. But I love the extra pictures and the ability to see the latest issues before it arrives in my mailbox as well as back issues I’ve long since recycled. The only thing that is missing from this app as a way to share articles from within the app. I wish I could share my favorite articles with my friends. Condé Nast, add sharing and I’ll change my rating to five stars.

This app is not accessible for people who are blind

blind Designer on

United States

I have been trying for over a decade to get architectural digest and Condé Nast to make this magazine accessible for people who are blind and they have not achieved that as of yet. They are missing out on a large demographic. It is very disconcerting.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Architectural Digest Competitors

Name
Southern Living Magazine
The Regions’ Best Insider Tips
Sotheby's
Great Art, Fascinating Stories
Morpholio Board - Moodboards
インテリアデザイン&インテリア
ELLE Magazine UK
TapGlance Interior Design
Architizer: A+ Architecture
Luxe Interiors + Design
Luxury Interiors
Magical Floor Planner | Design
Home decor, Floorplan creator
Interior Design PRO
Home Decor and Room Planner

Architectural Digest Installs

Last 30 days

Architectural Digest Revenue

Last 30 days

Architectural Digest Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Architectural Digest performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.