艺术史时间轴为孩子

Published by: Abécédaire
Downloads
Revenue

Description

艺术史为孩子是一个基于时间线的应用程序,提供的主要艺术风格简单的解释,同时强调重要的艺术家和关键的画作。
开始与穴居人一直到今天的涂鸦艺术家进行艺术!
应用包括配音,时间表,凉爽的事实和绘制自己的大作游戏!
了解:
史前艺术
古希腊罗马的古典艺术
中国古代,日本艺术
中年艺术
文艺复兴时期艺术
印象派
点画
表现主义
立体主义
超现实主义
抽象主义
波普艺术
街头艺术

适合于1年和2年的工作主要历史计划
在http://www.historyapps.co.uk更多信息

Screenshots

艺术史时间轴为孩子 FAQ

  • Is 艺术史时间轴为孩子 free?

    艺术史时间轴为孩子 is not free (it costs 22.00), however it doesn't contain in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 艺术史时间轴为孩子 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 艺术史时间轴为孩子 cost?

    The price of 艺术史时间轴为孩子 is 22.00.

  • What is 艺术史时间轴为孩子 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 艺术史时间轴为孩子 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in China yet.
Ratings History

艺术史时间轴为孩子 Reviews

Waste of Money

Alissa Leigh on

United States

The most poorly produced app I have ever seen. It seems to have been created by 5 year olds with almost no actual content

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

艺术史时间轴为孩子 Competitors

Name
Launching Latin
Art Legacy
艺术史
WW1 Daily
WW2 Daily
世界各国的地理情况EDU
百科全书和小测验
Westfield State Campus Tour
N/A
Art Authority for iPad
100,000 classic works of art
States - Flashcards and Quiz
Study Flashcards & Quizzes
Quizuon: Stock Market - Lite
N/A
Meimei. Kids Big Panda Story
Reading for Preschool Learners

Art History For Kids Installs

Last 30 days

Art History For Kids Revenue

Last 30 days

艺术史时间轴为孩子 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Art History For Kids performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.