App is temporarily unavailable
纸牌专业版-最原汁原味的接龙
Published by:
毅 郑
纸牌专业版 FAQ
-
Is 纸牌专业版 free?
Yes, 纸牌专业版 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.
-
Is 纸牌专业版 legit?
Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.
Thanks for the vote -
How much does 纸牌专业版 cost?
纸牌专业版 is free.
-
What is 纸牌专业版 revenue?
To get estimated revenue of 纸牌专业版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
4.69 out of 5
64 ratings in China
5 star
49
4 star
3
3 star
2
2 star
1
1 star
2
Ratings History
纸牌专业版 Reviews
App doesn't have any reviews yet
Classic Solitaire Pro Installs
Last 30 days
Classic Solitaire Pro Revenue
Last 30 days纸牌专业版 Revenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into Classic Solitaire Pro performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
App Info
- Category
- Games
- Publisher
- 毅 郑
- Languages
- Chinese, English
- Recent release
- 1.6.1 (1 year ago )
- Released on
- Dec 3, 2013 (11 years ago )
- Also available in
- United States, France, Germany, Netherlands, Canada, Spain, Russia, United Kingdom, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, Poland, Finland, Singapore, Japan, Belgium, Austria, Nepal, Norway, Lithuania, Nigeria, Malaysia, Madagascar, Latvia, Iceland, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Thailand, Türkiye, Taiwan, Ukraine, Vietnam, South Africa, Egypt, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Brunei, Belarus, Switzerland, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Algeria, Ecuador, Lebanon, Greece, Hong Kong SAR China, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, India, United Arab Emirates, Italy, Kuwait, Kazakhstan
- Last Updated
- 1 month ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.