赶考状元

自主学习资源及工具

Description

赶考状元专注于教学信息化建设与技术研发,目前拥有学习资源、AI测评等自主学习工具

In-Apps

“元宝充值25元“
$4.99
“元宝充值68元“
$12.99
“元宝充值128元“
$24.99
“元宝充值198元“
$39.99
“元宝充值248元“
$49.99
“英语听说会员(三年)”
$99.99
【志愿填报】功能的会员(1年)
$99.99
“英语听说会员(一年)298元”
$49.99
“英语听说会员(两年)488元”
$99.99
“赶考状元全学段六年卡 2298元”
$499.99

Screenshots

赶考状元 FAQ

  • Is 赶考状元 free?

    Yes, 赶考状元 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 赶考状元 legit?

    ⚠️ The 赶考状元 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 赶考状元 cost?

    赶考状元 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $98.29.

  • What is 赶考状元 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 赶考状元 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Canada yet.
Ratings History

赶考状元 Reviews

别买

默默88吧 on

China

别买 有问题还不能退款 别上当

反馈

沈悠南 on

China

我购买了高中全年的vip 会员卡,有效期至2026年,但今天上线去资源里面学习的时候,却告知我需要购买会员,联系客服也不回答

👎

巴啦啦能量超级无敌美少女战士 on

China

不好差 坑钱

垃圾

wjxw t x on

China

垃圾软件,照着课本念有意思吗。早点下架吧,别嚯嚯学生了。呵呵😄

很不错的学习软件

楼哦lol不啦啦咯啦咯 on

China

各个科目都很齐全

.

xffjfff on

China

垃圾中的垃圾

wdidhdhhdhdhdhejjdbdgg on

China

说真的,没用过这么差的软件,连双击暂停都不行,左右也不能拉快进度,而且老师讲的题过程不详细,答案都不知道哪来的

题目重复率高

忘记你是那位 on

China

在连续练习的时候,题目有时会出现重复,有时候同一次练习也会出现重复情况,其他的方面平台做得都挺好

不好用

xxs Zz on

China

不好用

垃圾

的美好时刻 on

China

垃圾

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

赶考状元 Competitors

赶考状元 Installs

Last 30 days

赶考状元 Revenue

Last 30 days

赶考状元 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 赶考状元 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.