二重露光

一眼 写真 撮影 撮影 一眼レフ

Published by: Allez Interactive

Description

全てのスクリーンショットは、二重露光を使用してものでMark Binks Photographyによりカメラ内で作成されました。
付属のチュートリアルが美しい2重露出の作成方法を説明します。
iPhone用二重露光で二重露出を迅速・簡単に作成。
始めるには二重露光 を今すぐダウンロード!

In-Apps

PRO - 毎月
¥280.00
PRO - 1回の購入
¥1.65

Screenshots

二重露光 FAQ

  • Is 二重露光 free?

    Yes, 二重露光 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 二重露光 legit?

    ⚠️ The 二重露光 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 二重露光 cost?

    二重露光 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥140.83.

  • What is 二重露光 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 二重露光 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

二重露光 Reviews

No Delay Timer for Shutter

AdminNorm on

United States

I love the concept. As others have mentioned, it’s difficult to evaluate the free download version. Too many locked features. A Double Exposure camera app really needs to have a delay timer for shutter activation. Or remote activation. I could try the 3-days free pro version to evaluate better, but I always feel iffy about those. Meanwhile, I’ll keep looking for alternatives.

Looks Nice

Dr3am1n9 on

United States

But Snapseed is better! Especially if you just need a simple “Double Exposure”… SMH that’s all I needed and wanted to try something new. It’s a shame that you can’t even make a nice simple double exposure without having to pay. Not Evan a trial period? Oh well… 🗣️ DELETE! ✌️

No Way to Tell if it’s Worth It

Gingerbreadforest on

United States

The one free mode that is available does not have good results and has a giant water mark. With so many other photo apps available, I’ll save for something I know will take desirable pictures. Already deleted the app.

Library…

wpqpwpqpeiuyxnenr on

United States

Unable to open any pics in my Library and had to PAY to find that out!

Watermark is kind of obnoxious

kadva99 on

United States

I would be ok with keeping a small watermark but the watermark is huge and aggressive so i can’t even test it out properly before paying for a pro version

Needs more work

John DeNicola on

United States

I am intrigued by the idea of a live double exposure camera. The number of features that are locked is insufficient to evaluate you app. Against my better judgement, I tried to upgrade to pro. It failed numerous times, as well as the app itself. Perhaps, in the future, if you address those issues I will revisit it. What is the format and does it have a zoom feature. Disappointed user

Great

Salo23 on

United States

Really cool app

Needs blend modes

kentphoto on

United States

This would be a five star app if you put in some blend modes otherwise it’s kind of difficult to make two images work well together you might want to also consider incorporating a masking feature.

Great app !

Nick 255 on

United States

Easy to use. Just have to balance the light between the two exposures so both can be seen. Use the ring at the bottom to control how much light gets to each exposure

Like a real double exposure

noordinarysuperman on

United States

This app is great! I have made amazing photos with it. :)

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

二重露光 Competitors

Double Exposure Installs

Last 30 days

Double Exposure Revenue

Last 30 days

二重露光 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Double Exposure performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.