Downloads
Revenue

Description

全新的得实e学app可选择学校订购的不同产品,其中,在线学习系列产品拥有了全新的上课场景,极大地便利了老师的教学;教学诊改系列产品可对中高职院校各层面诊改进行全方面的把控与预警,欢迎下载体验!

Screenshots

得实e学Plus FAQ

  • Is 得实e学Plus free?

    Yes, 得实e学Plus is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 得实e学Plus legit?

    ⚠️ The 得实e学Plus app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 得实e学Plus cost?

    得实e学Plus is free.

  • What is 得实e学Plus revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 得实e学Plus app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Ireland yet.
Ratings History

得实e学Plus Reviews

垃圾

kuromi567 on

China

为什么一进去就要改密码,改了好几次了

垃圾

15.7× on

China

垃圾 一直闪退 登录就闪退 一星都不想给

登陆不了

15915363593 on

China

为什么一登陆就显示“网络发生错误,登陆失败!”,这个问题已经很久了都没得到解决,不止是我有这种情况,身边凡是用ios系统的都登陆不了,安卓偶尔可以,有时候也不行,绝不是网络问题。兼容不行就别开发软件,用这软件的前提还要买部安卓手机

垃圾

最垃圾的实习软件 on

China

垃圾垃圾真垃圾

何止是垃圾

我想好在想 on

China

垃圾平台垃圾软件,一颗星不是我的底线,而是评论区的底线,废物软件

能不能优化优化,闪退没完了?登录签到都不行

11苹果梨 on

China

1¥¥@快

经常闪退卡顿

zsjfkansxjjemwjx on

China

真受不了

垃圾软件

susikqnn on

China

完全就是一个不合格的软件,网络差,反应慢,闪退,根本没办法正常使用。建议老板趁早收了

垃圾软件

勇者见仁不仁 on

China

真棒

什么垃圾玩意

xxxxxjjjjj1111 on

China

进都进不去

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

得实e学Plus Competitors

Name
iSmart-学生
智慧职教icve
微知库学生版
微知库
智博在线
智课堂,您的掌上智慧课堂!
您可信赖的智慧教学专家!
青春山东
共青团山东省委移动服务总门户
师大网校
精通学堂-大学生及在职人员专升本备考综合学习平台
冠人网校

得实e学Plus Installs

Last 30 days

得实e学Plus Revenue

Last 30 days

得实e学Plus Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 得实e学Plus performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.