EZ短信-垃圾騷擾短信過濾攔截

人工智能識別垃圾騷擾短信過濾

Published by: 铃响 黄

Description

EZ短信,智能垃圾短信過濾。
數萬條真實短信訓練出精準智能過濾模型。
樣本真人分類,更符合大眾需求。
多種類型,精準過濾。
【功能說明】
1,默認使用AI智能分類,安裝即用
2,支持號碼過濾
3,支持短信內容關鍵詞過濾
4,自由組合排列攔截規則
5,支持完全離線攔截,隱私無憂

Screenshots

EZ短信 FAQ

  • Is EZ短信 free?

    Yes, EZ短信 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is EZ短信 legit?

    ⚠️ The EZ短信 app has poor ratings and negative feedback. Users seem unsatisfied with its performance or features.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does EZ短信 cost?

    EZ短信 is free.

  • What is EZ短信 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of EZ短信 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Taiwan yet.
Ratings History

EZ短信 Reviews

垃圾软件

新股ins他 on

China

一点不好用,垃圾东西拦截不了,正常短信就给拦截了,差评

不收费无广告给五星但是我有个问题

ugdvhydhjfbjgdc on

China

是公益短信过滤不掉吗?我添加了关键字黑名单 用测试功能也测出来了是公益短信并且对话框提示会放到垃圾短信分组里 为什么每条公益短信还是会收到呢??? 还有短信类型里我已经把 通知,祝福,公益短信 给关掉了

白名单不好使了谁能修一下

zbshshebe on

China

白名单不好使了谁能修一下

闪退

你真是让人无奈 on

China

频繁闪退

申请版本回退

天尊杨戟 on

China

现版本白名单黑名单无法编辑

bug不断啊

Kevin777- on

China

点白黑名单添加一会就会闪退

不知道为啥 iPad不能过滤

Pertichor on

China

iPad也安装了 但是不可以过滤 手机可以 同步了设置也不行 这是为啥?

优化工程师技术差

永丨恒 on

China

能不能花钱找个靠谱的工程师优化 黑明单给我粘贴复制到白名单上去了 这跟没用软件有啥区别 这种低级错误 刚毕业的大学生都不一定能犯

偶老李了 on

China

软件出现闪退 拦截不够干净

不够智能

傅傅傅傅傅傅付 on

China

很多垃圾信息不能够屏蔽

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
61
Top Paid
311

Keywords

EZ短信 Installs

Last 30 days

EZ短信 Revenue

Last 30 days

EZ短信 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into EZ短信 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.