數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題

Published by: Stanley Lam

Description

數和:
被斜線分開的方格中,右上的數字等於其右側數字之和,左下的數字等於其下方數字之和。
無論是橫向還是縱向,連續方格中的數字不能重複。例如總和是4的兩個方格只可是 1 和 3, 不可是 2 和 2
點數和:
被斜線分開的方格中,右上的數字等於其右側數字之和,左下的數字等於其下方數字之和。
每一行和列內,每個數字只能出現一次
若2個相鄰的方格有一點,它們的相差為 1
若2個相鄰的方格沒有一點,它們的相差大過 1
#內容
- 數和 : 5種難度
- 點數和 : 3種大小
#功能
- 筆記功能
- 提示功能顯示有可能的數字組合
- 自動記錄未完成的進度
- 記錄最快完成時間

In-Apps

數和上級
$30.00
數和中級
$30.00
數和初級
$30.00
點數和混合
$30.00
點數和 10 x 10
$30.00
點數和 11 x 11
$30.00
點數和 12 x 12
$30.00

Screenshots

數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 FAQ

  • Is 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 free?

    Yes, 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 legit?

    🤔 The 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 cost?

    數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is $30.00.

  • What is 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

5 out of 5

1 ratings in Taiwan

5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Ratings History

數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 Reviews

Great but not enough puzzles

Bunkinhunter on

United States

This was my favorite Nakuru game but it has a limited number of puzzles. After you solve all the free and the paid puzzles your only option it to do the previously solved puzzles over again. They haven’t added any new puzzles.

Numbers not working

Vekrab 12 on

United States

Great game, but the numbers mainly 123 do not work most of the time.

Too easy, extreme done in 2:36 and no big puzzles

puzlgeik on

United States

Avoid

Great app!

me clt 56 on

United States

I downloaded dot Kakuro because it reminded me of kropki. Dot Kakuro is fun to play and is one of my favorite number games.

Very easy to use

bobw96 on

United States

Much more convenient than by paper and pencil

Give us more

Yankeejimg on

United States

I have really enjoyed this game. Each time I learn some “other”trick or nuance. I would love to see an app devoted to “dot” Kakuro, so there would be more to choose from. Good job.

Not hard enough.

Marygerry on

United States

I enjoy the game ,but it is not hard enough.

Creative and fun

ProdevteamConvert on

United States

Very creative variation of kakuro and a lot of fun. Seems a bit more challenging at start

I love it.

Sultaniia on

United States

Works very smoothly. So good for keeping sharp with numbers and absolutely addictive. You learn numbers with very limited possibilities quickly and the game speeds up.

Enjoyable, easy to use, a bit stingy

hopefullskywatcher on

United States

I'd say this game is pretty good. So far I've played Kukuro, and Dot Kukuro which I like because you get to use the type of logic required for Sudoku in a Kukuro puzzle. I didn't rate it higher because you only get 35 free puzzles. Then each set of 25 puzzles is 99 cents each. Seriously way too expensive. Other apps I've used are much more generous. On the other hand, out of the three I've tried, this one is the easiest to use, has the best design. This app is worth downloading to play 35 free puzzles. After that, I'd look elsewhere.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 Competitors

Kakuro Challenge Installs

Last 30 days

Kakuro Challenge Revenue

Last 30 days

數和挑戰 經典邏輯謎題 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Kakuro Challenge performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.