Losing chess

The most popular chess variant

Published by: Jan Maes

Description

Play losing chess against the AI, solve one of the 100 puzzles, or play against a friend on the same device.
Losing chess is one of the most popular chess variants. The overall goal of each player is to lose all of their pieces or be stalemated.
The rules are the same as those for standard chess, except for the following special rules:
- capturing is compulsory.
- The king has no royal power and it may be captured as any other piece.
- There is no check or checkmate and no castling.
- A pawn can be promoted to a king.
A player wins by being unable to make a move. This can be because he has no pieces left or his pieces are stalemated.
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

Losing chess FAQ

  • Is Losing chess free?

    Yes, Losing chess is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is Losing chess legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does Losing chess cost?

    Losing chess is free.

  • What is Losing chess revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of Losing chess app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Poland yet.
Ratings History

Losing chess Reviews

No Reviews in Poland
App doesn't have any reviews in Poland yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Losing chess Installs

Last 30 days

Losing chess Revenue

Last 30 days

Losing chess Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Losing chess performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.