Under appreciated
I cannot day enough about how important this app and its original book are to the study of Logic.
ReasonLines
Published by:
Wallace Murphree
Description
ReasonLines provides (1) a new and easier approach to the traditional syllogism and (2) an expansion of the traditional syllogism to include numerical quantification.
1)The new approach to the traditional syllogism
Instead of considering isolated statements as the components of arguments, such as major premise, minor premise, and conclusion, this new approach bundles each statement with its equivalents and each bundle is represented by its own “schematic” of arrows. The premise schematics can then be dropped in place along side each other where their juxtaposition displays whatever conclusion, if any, is entailed. The user only needs to learn how to select the correct premise schematics and how to follow the arrows for a conclusion.
Part One of the Help page is a tutorial for this new approach.
(2)The numerical expansion of the traditional syllogism
It is already standard to interpret the particular quantifier numerically; that is, it is standard to take “some” as “at least one.” Moreover, the universal quantifiers, “all” and “no,” can also be faithfully rendered numerically since “all” means “all with zero exception” and “no” means none “none with zero exception.” Given this, it turns out that the traditional quantifiers simply mark the beginnings of endless possible quantifications since “at least one” opens the series of “at least two,” “at least three,” etc., and “all (none) but zero” opens “all (none) but one,” “all (none) but two,” etc.
By making this explicit, the zero and one of traditional syllogisms become replaceable by other numbers. So, for example, “All but 10 A are B and all but 20 B are C, so All but 30 A are C,” and “At least 100 A are B, All but 7 B are C, so At least 93 A are C,” are just as valid as the traditional Barbara and Darii, and for the very same reason.
Part Two of the Help page develops this numerical expansion by appealing to the schematics.
Hide
Show More...
1)The new approach to the traditional syllogism
Instead of considering isolated statements as the components of arguments, such as major premise, minor premise, and conclusion, this new approach bundles each statement with its equivalents and each bundle is represented by its own “schematic” of arrows. The premise schematics can then be dropped in place along side each other where their juxtaposition displays whatever conclusion, if any, is entailed. The user only needs to learn how to select the correct premise schematics and how to follow the arrows for a conclusion.
Part One of the Help page is a tutorial for this new approach.
(2)The numerical expansion of the traditional syllogism
It is already standard to interpret the particular quantifier numerically; that is, it is standard to take “some” as “at least one.” Moreover, the universal quantifiers, “all” and “no,” can also be faithfully rendered numerically since “all” means “all with zero exception” and “no” means none “none with zero exception.” Given this, it turns out that the traditional quantifiers simply mark the beginnings of endless possible quantifications since “at least one” opens the series of “at least two,” “at least three,” etc., and “all (none) but zero” opens “all (none) but one,” “all (none) but two,” etc.
By making this explicit, the zero and one of traditional syllogisms become replaceable by other numbers. So, for example, “All but 10 A are B and all but 20 B are C, so All but 30 A are C,” and “At least 100 A are B, All but 7 B are C, so At least 93 A are C,” are just as valid as the traditional Barbara and Darii, and for the very same reason.
Part Two of the Help page develops this numerical expansion by appealing to the schematics.
Screenshots
ReasonLines FAQ
-
Is ReasonLines free?
Yes, ReasonLines is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.
-
Is ReasonLines legit?
Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.
Thanks for the vote -
How much does ReasonLines cost?
ReasonLines is free.
-
What is ReasonLines revenue?
To get estimated revenue of ReasonLines app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
App is not rated in Lebanon yet.
Ratings History
ReasonLines Reviews
Store Rankings
Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet
ReasonLines Competitors
| Name | Downloads (30d) | Monthly Revenue | Reviews | Ratings | Recent release | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elemental Analysis Calculator
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
2 years ago | |
AngularQM
The Quantum Angular Momentum
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
2 years ago | |
ArguMap Pro - Map Arguments
Diagram Critical Thinking
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
3 months ago | |
Acadcheck: Concept Assessments
Discover Gaps in Learning
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
2 years ago | |
Algebra without Fear
Practice Basic Algeba Skills
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
1 month ago | |
Algebra Concepts for iPad
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
2 years ago | |
English Grammar Practices
flashcards, questions
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
1 year ago | |
Binary Code Toolkit
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
2 years ago | |
Epicycles
Experiment with Fourier series
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
1 year ago | |
Mathematical Proofs
|
Unlock
|
Unlock
|
0
|
|
10 months ago |
ReasonLines Installs
Last 30 days
ReasonLines Revenue
Last 30 daysReasonLines Revenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into ReasonLines performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
App Info
- Category
- Education
- Publisher
- Wallace Murphree
- Languages
- English
- Recent release
- 1.3 (9 months ago )
- Released on
- Jan 6, 2017 (7 years ago )
- Also available in
- United States , Russia , New Zealand , Israel , India , Italy , Japan , South Korea , Kuwait , Kazakhstan , Lebanon , Mexico , Malaysia , Nigeria , Netherlands , Norway , Ireland , Peru , Philippines , Pakistan , Poland , Romania , Sweden , Singapore , Thailand , Ukraine , Vietnam , South Africa , Germany , Argentina , Austria , Australia , Azerbaijan , Belgium , Brazil , Belarus , Canada , Switzerland , Chile , China , Colombia , Czechia , United Arab Emirates , Denmark , Dominican Republic , Algeria , Ecuador , Egypt , Spain , Finland , France , United Kingdom , Greece , Hong Kong SAR China , Hungary , Indonesia
- Last Updated
- 4 days ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.